Citations follow the move into docs/

This commit is contained in:
Joseph Ferano 2026-09-14 07:38:23 +07:00
parent 5a4f12bacd
commit 1a6ea7ae69
2 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ as a snapshot: it pins `dev-loop` at `e725a5a`, and since then the arithmetic-co
redefinition emitter, the aggregate case across the reload boundary, the two unreached guards, DWARF for
`--x86`, the cost measurements, the last two raylib ports and the `dune test` noise have all landed. The
x86 survey it quotes at 97 now reports **103 MATCH, 0 DIFFER, 0 refused by name, 38 skipped**, and of the
seven remaining items it lists from `HANDOFF-x86-rt.md`, items 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 are done — each has a
`HANDOFF-x86-*.md` of its own.
seven remaining items it lists from `docs/handoffs/HANDOFF-x86-rt.md`, items 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 are done —
each has a `docs/handoffs/HANDOFF-x86-*.md` of its own.
**Branch `dev-loop` at `e725a5a`, working tree clean, `dune test` green, every lane merged.**
Nothing is running and nothing is half-built.

View File

@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ is Clojure's ~ns~ form: no path that must mirror the directory, no
* Compilation
*One evaluator and three paths.* The split is not dev-vs-release; it is
/does this code have a frame budget/. There is no interpreter: open decision #7
is settled the other way from how this section was first written, and BUILT.md's
is settled the other way from how this section was first written, and docs/BUILT.md's
"Why there is no interpreter" carries the reasoning. Compiling is the only way a
form is ever run, so there is no second evaluator that could disagree with the
first about what a program means.
@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ debugger that wanted it is cut (see Tooling); and milestone 3 did not need it as
an oracle either, because the acceptance table is hand-written and the table /is/
the oracle. What is bought by dropping it is the standing obligation: two
evaluators must agree on observable behaviour forever, and every divergence is a
bug that reproduces in only one of them. BUILT.md's "Why there is no interpreter"
bug that reproduces in only one of them. docs/BUILT.md's "Why there is no interpreter"
records the decision; ~lib/expand.ml~ states it at the top of the file, because
macros are where the absence stopped being free — a macro has to run at compile
time and there is nothing to interpret it with, so the compiler compiles it into
@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ marked.
migration", or "accepted and the old code keeps running".
7. Does the interpreter survive milestone 3, or is the compiled path the only
backend? /Settled: the compiled path is the only one, and there is no
interpreter./ See Compilation, and BUILT.md's "Why there is no interpreter".
interpreter./ See Compilation, and docs/BUILT.md's "Why there is no interpreter".
8. ~(Option a)~ /settled:/ an ordinary stdlib union with ~Some~/~None~; the
compiler niche-optimises ~(Option (Ptr T))~ to a nullable pointer. The
CL-vs-Clojure truthiness question is moot under static typing.