The capability lists were written before the code held the line they claim.
Under an expression root, RET on a field of a union built `(.at s)' and sent
it, and the checker refused it — "a union's fields belong to a case ... they
are reached by (match ...)". A refusal from the far end of a socket is exactly
what this buffer's own comment says not to do: every refusal is by name, here,
with the reason, because RET working on some lines and erroring on others
teaches nothing about the language.
It is a refusal of the *parent* and not of the value at point, which is why it
is not in `flan-inspect-refusal': a struct field that merely holds a union is
an ordinary accessor and has to stay enterable. It is a field of the union
itself that cannot be written. The two cases are one test each.
The slot root steps into it by offset and is unaffected, which is the
difference the manual now claims and the tests now show.
`lib/dev.ml' cited DISCUSS.md item 1 as a hole; item 1 is the answer now, so
it cites BUILT.md instead. And the item 1 stub is two sentences and a pointer
— everything else in it is in BUILT.md verbatim, and DISCUSS.md's own header
says nothing in it is a decision.
Joseph Ferano
306fc88094