The refusal for a frame whose body has been redefined underneath it did not
fire because four of its five hand-offs were never written. `Emit.fninfo` has
been storing `slot_fingerprint` in the last `i32` of every `%fninfo` all along;
`flan_dev.c` called that field `spare`, there was no accessor for it, the agent
never snapshotted it, the backtrace line never carried it, and `Dev.locals`
compared slot counts and nothing else. The handoff note's "every piece is
written and the refusal does not happen" was a guess, and the first step it
suggested — printing both sides of the comparison — could not have found it,
because there was no comparison.
So: `spare` becomes `slotsig` and gets `flan_dev_frame_slotsig`; the agent
snapshots it beside the slot count and puts it on the backtrace line *before*
the location, since the name is the one field that can contain a space and has
to stay last; `Dev.backtrace` parses it; `Dev.locals` compares it against
`Emit.slot_fingerprint` of the body this session holds and refuses by name when
they differ. No change to `emit.ml` — the value was already there.
The mechanism itself is right and stays. `slot_fingerprint` hashes every slot's
name together with the spelling of its type, so a rename that keeps the count
and the types — exactly the case this exists for — changes it. The count check
stays in front of it because its message is the more specific one.
The fingerprint stays off the wire. A hash is not something an editor can act
on, and the refusal says the fact in words: this frame's body was redefined
since it was entered, so its names no longer describe its values.
`test_dev.ml` gains the inverse and the control. A body that drops a `let` is
refused on the count, and `main` — untouched by the redefinition of `look` —
must still answer, which is the assertion that would catch a fingerprint that
never matched anything and made the verb useless while turning the suite green.
Joseph Ferano
10b736f23e