x86.ml was an encoder and a frame model with nothing calling it. It now
lowers a whole Tast.program to an assembly file, and `flan build --x86`
hands that file to the same clang invocation the LLVM path uses, against
the same runtime objects. The flag is off by default; LLVM stays the
release backend and the default one.
Three programs, built both ways and compared by what they print and what
they exit with rather than by reading bytes: exit 0; a dotimes that
prints; and a fizz over a call, an if, a remainder and two string
literals. All three agree with the LLVM build.
The measurement decided the target. hist.ml over the fizz program shows
no Signal, no Handled, no RestartCase — a loop that prints does not drag
conditions in. What does is the bounds check and the allocator, and
neither is in the reachable set of a program that prints a number.
That is why there is no transfer guard here, and check_no_transfer is
what makes the omission sound rather than hopeful: if nothing reachable
can write the channel, no call can return with it set. It is a
whole-program property, so it is checked once per build and the build
stops with the node's name when it fails.
Joseph Ferano
2155c41465