Joseph Ferano
216d1c0ab0
The two new fault-by-design programs came into the corpus with the bytes/bytes-view lane and the survey has been comparing them at its own optimisation level, where the store into .rodata is undefined, LLVM deletes it and exits 0, and this backend -- which has no optimiser to delete anything with -- executes it and takes 139. That reads as a lowering disagreement and is not one: at -O0 the two backends agree exactly, and test_acceptance.ml's dies_segv rows already pin that on both of them. So a second exclusion list beside the one for the programs that never stop, with its own reason written down, rather than building the whole corpus at -O0 and changing the measurement every baseline was taken against. dev-segv would belong on it in any case: it calls agent/start, and under --dev it parks in the break loop rather than dying. MATCH 171, DIFFER 0, REFUSED 0, NOX86 0, SKIP 47