Joseph Ferano 27172d260f Collision bindings, and what a headless FFI test cannot pin
Finishing the 2D lane's unfinished work: the collision family was written and
had no tests when the session ended. It is the best material a headless table
gets, since every one of these is pure and needs no GL context.

Two plausible tests in a row turned out to check nothing, and that is the part
worth keeping. A struct round trip is symmetric and passes for any field order -
the texture lane found that one. The second is subtler: no axis-aligned geometry
can pin Vector2's fields, because exchanging x and y is a reflection that is
applied on the way in and undone on the way out. Swapping the shim's own typedef
leaves every collision case passing. Distances never even see it.

What does pin Vector2 is the rotated camera, because a rotation is not
axis-aligned and does not commute with the reflection. That case is load-bearing
and the comment now says so, because the collision cases look like they cover
the same ground and do not.

What the new cases do pin is Rectangle, completely: swapping width and height
turns three of the four predicates the wrong way. Verified by doing it.

collision-lines answers (Option Vector2) rather than a bool and an
out-parameter, because raylib leaves the out-parameter untouched when the
segments do not meet and a caller who forgets reads whatever was there.
2026-09-11 19:01:32 +07:00
..