(and a b) desugared to (if a b false), so it answered the last operand
only when every operand was truthy; a falsey one came back as a bare
false, where Clojure answers the falsey operand itself. It now uses the
same expansion or got in ad0f1fb -- (let [t a] (if t b t)) against or's
(let [t a] (if t t b)) -- so the operand that decided the form is the
answer, and the test is still evaluated exactly once.
The temp binding and its if now carry the operand's own loc rather than
the whole form's, which the or fix had lost: (or (vec-new i32) v) blamed
the enclosing form at 3:13 and now points at 3:18, the operand, and and's
second operand gained the same precision.
The parse pins in test_flan.ml now tie the bound name to the temp the if
tests and the bound value to the first operand, so a desugaring that
dropped the temp and wrote the operand into the arm twice no longer
passes; and has its own pin. dyn-if-truthy.flan grows the falsey-nil and
falsey-false answers, 0 and "" as truthy operands, one- and zero-operand
forms, and a printing operand that proves both the short circuit and the
single evaluation.
One behaviour that used to compile changed: with both arms of the
desugared if now holding real values, (and dyn-value typed-bool) unifies
on the typed arm and a non-bool dyn decider traps at the strict bool
boundary -- (and (box nil) some-bool) printed false and now traps, the
mirror of what (or false (box "s")) already did on dev-loop. Recorded in
FIX.org as the author's call on how check_if should join a bool arm and a
dyn arm.
Joseph Ferano
bddc8fc5dd