Two ways to write a match over an enum and two different refusals, neither
of them true. (match k :lo ...) died in the parser with "expected a pattern,
found :hi" — which arm it named depended on cons evaluation order, and it
never mentioned enums. (match k lo ...) died in the checker blaming milestone
2, which is not what stands in the way.
What stands in the way is worth writing down, because the feature is close.
An enum is an i32 at run time and its members are all known, so the arms are
a chain of (= k :member) and the exhaustiveness check falls out of env.enums
— a desugaring, no new IR node, the same shape as everything else this lane
landed. What is missing is a case in Ast.pattern for a keyword, and load.ml
matches that type exhaustively with no wildcard, so the variant cannot be
added from a session that does not own the file. One line, for whoever does.
That is also why destructuring went through a call to an unspellable name
instead: a name in call position is an open namespace check.ml already owns,
whereas tagging Pctor with ":lo" would put a second meaning into a field
another file destructures as a constructor.
The struct-tail case in the acceptance program is unrelated housekeeping: the
corpus slices arrays of i32, u8 and f32 and nothing wider, so nothing else
proves the desugared (slice xs n (len xs)) gets a struct's stride right.
Joseph Ferano
4428c864cf