Joseph Ferano 4aa24c0e33 The zero-root question is the integrator's, and the handoff says which asks are open
Two decisions in this lane went against the brief and both are written down
where the next reader will meet them: the return slot stayed mandatory, so the
third state ret = None was to grow does not exist and neither does the fallout
listed for load.ml, shim.ml and cimport.ml; and the parameter rule is resolved in
Check rather than in parse.ml, because cimport passes C type names through
verbatim and POSIX's lowercase stat and timespec are writable in parameter
position, which is what makes a syntactic rule unsound rather than merely
awkward.

The open ABI point is in flan_dyn.h beside the root functions rather than only
in the handoff, because the header is what the two sides diff. A rooted slot
holding 0 is not a value: the compiler zeroes every root at entry because the
push happens before the code that fills it and possibly for a branch that never
runs, and 0 is the only pattern it can write without knowing the encoding. If
the real runtime NaN-boxes and integer zero is the zero word then this is wrong
and both sides change together.

Session.compatible needed nothing: it compares with Types.equal over the
parameters and the return, and dyn is equal to itself and to nothing else. Both
directions are pinned anyway, because this is the one place "changes signature"
covers a change the source does not spell out -- a parameter can become dyn, or
stop being dyn, by a type being declared elsewhere in the program.

@x86 128 match 0 differ 0 refused, @sanitize clean, dune test green.
2026-09-19 06:36:23 +07:00
..