Joseph Ferano 7ce6043c47 A second and third sort, and why there is not a generic one
sort-i32! was the only sort in the language. sort-f32! and sort-bytes! are
the other two, and they are copies rather than an abstraction for a reason
worth naming precisely: map, filter, reduce and a sort taking a comparator
are not blocked on generics, they are blocked on *function values*. Types.Fn
exists and check.ml refuses it with "a function type is not implemented yet --
milestone 5", and there is nothing else in the language to pass. Generics on
top of that is what would make them one copy instead of one per element type.

The f32 family carries one caveat the i32 family cannot have: a NaN makes the
order undefined, because every comparison against one is false, so the
insertion loop never moves it and never moves anything past it. sum-f32
accumulates in f64 for a stronger version of sum-i32's argument -- an f32
total does not wrap, it absorbs, and the answer comes out silently short.
The test prints the difference rather than the total, because %g hides it.

sort-bytes! is the one a caller of split actually wants, and its ordering is
memcmp's: bytewise, unsigned, prefix first. Not alphabetical -- "Zebra" sorts
before "apple" -- and the note says so, for the same reason the ASCII-case
note refuses a locale. The slices move and the bytes never do, so it sorts
fields borrowed out of a string literal, which an in-place byte sort could
not.
2026-09-12 21:58:12 +07:00
..
2026-09-12 20:59:12 +07:00
2026-09-10 14:40:34 +07:00
2026-09-12 20:59:12 +07:00
2026-09-12 20:59:12 +07:00