flan/test/test_acceptance.ml
Joseph Ferano 7fcda905ff parse-i64 in Flan, because strtoll answers 0 four different ways
bytes->i64 is strtoll behind a primitive, and strtoll returns 0 for "", for
"abc", for a lone "-", and for the "12" in "12x". None of those is
distinguishable from a real 0, so any program that parses input it did not
write is already wrong and has no way to find out. parse-i64 takes the whole
slice or refuses it and says so with None. It is also the version that answers
the same on wasm32: strtoll is libc's and locale-sensitive, which is the same
argument that put the PRNG in the prelude rather than leaving it to rand().

The byte predicates are over [u8] rather than over string on purpose. (bytes s)
is one call at the call site, and in exchange one copy of each function serves
strings and byte slices both — which is as near a generic as this gets. Each
tests its length before it slices, and `and` short-circuits, so a prefix longer
than the subject answers false instead of tripping the slice bounds check.

sign-f32 and lerp are the only two numeric helpers here, because they are the
only two that decide something. clamp is (min hi (max lo x)) and abs is
(max x (- 0 x)) over builtins that already exist — a prelude wrapper is a
function emitted into every program to save a caller nothing. sign-f32 answers
0.0 for NaN, which is a choice and is written down. lerp is the weighted sum
and not a + t*(b - a): the latter does not land on b exactly at t = 1.0, and a
position that never quite arrives is what interpolation gets bug reports for.

floor, ceil and round are deliberately absent. (f32 (i32 x)) is fptosi, which
is poison out of range, and shipping that as a documented limitation is the
same class of bug NEXT.md already records twice under Sharp edges. Correct
lowering is llvm.floor.f32 in emit.ml, which is not this lane. sqrt is absent
for a different reason: it is an extern to libm, and what libm means on wasm32
is a decision the FFI owns, not the prelude.

rand-i32-range answers lo for an empty or reversed range rather than dividing
by zero, which is immediate undefined behaviour and not merely a wrong number.
Both range functions draw exactly one rand-u32 and neither changes it, so the
sand hash still pins the generator; the new test pins the derivations off a
fixed seed, which nothing else would have caught.
2026-09-11 18:49:52 +07:00

308 lines
14 KiB
OCaml

(* The milestone-2 acceptance test: a table of expression/result pairs run
through a compiled calc-me (plan.org, Build sequence).
It is a table rather than a golden file because milestone 3 runs the *same*
table on wasm32 — headless is what makes one test cover both targets. *)
open Flan
let failures = ref 0
let scratch = Filename.get_temp_dir_name ()
let run exe arg =
let out = Filename.concat scratch "flan-acceptance.out" in
let cmd =
Printf.sprintf "%s %s > %s 2>&1"
(Filename.quote exe)
(match arg with None -> "" | Some a -> Filename.quote a)
(Filename.quote out)
in
let code = Sys.command cmd in
let text = In_channel.with_open_bin out In_channel.input_all in
Sys.remove out;
(code, text)
let compile ?(opt = "-O2") ?(checks = true) ?(dev = false) path =
let exe =
Filename.concat scratch
("flan-t-" ^ Filename.remove_extension (Filename.basename path))
in
(* Through [Load], so a program with an (import ...) is buildable here: it
brings back the package's C shim and linker arguments as well. *)
let l = Load.program ~file:path (Parse.program (Reader.read_file path)) in
let p = Check.program l.Load.decls in
ignore (Build.executable ~opts:{ Build.default with opt; checks; dev }
~csrcs:l.Load.csrcs ~lflags:l.Load.lflags p ~out:exe);
exe
(* No Str, and the reader is hand-written for the same reason. *)
let contains hay needle =
let n = String.length needle and h = String.length hay in
let rec go i = i + n <= h && (String.sub hay i n = needle || go (i + 1)) in
go 0
let () =
match Sys.command "command -v clang > /dev/null 2>&1" with
| 0 ->
let exe = compile "../calc-me.flan" in
let case name arg expected_out expected_code =
let code, text = run exe arg in
if text <> expected_out || code <> expected_code then begin
incr failures;
Printf.printf
"FAIL %s\n got: %S (exit %d)\n wanted: %S (exit %d)\n"
name text code expected_out expected_code
end
in
let evaluates src expected = case src (Some src) (expected ^ "\n") 0 in
let rejects src = case src (Some src) "calc-me: cannot parse\n" 1 in
(* Arithmetic and precedence *)
evaluates "1 + 2 * (3 - 0.5) / 2" "3.5";
evaluates "1+2*3" "7";
evaluates "2*3+4" "10";
evaluates "(1+2)*3" "9";
evaluates "10/4" "2.5";
evaluates "7" "7";
evaluates " 7 " "7";
evaluates "1.5+2.25" "3.75";
(* Left-associative: 1-2-3 is (1-2)-3, not 1-(2-3) *)
evaluates "1-2-3" "-4";
evaluates "8/4/2" "1";
(* Unary minus, including nested *)
evaluates "-5" "-5";
evaluates "-(1+2)" "-3";
evaluates "3 * -2" "-6";
(* Whole input or nothing: trailing junk is an error, not ignored *)
rejects "1 +";
rejects "(1+2";
rejects "1 2";
rejects "";
rejects "+";
rejects "1+2)";
case "no argument" None "usage: calc-me \"1 + 2 * 3\"\n" 1;
(try Sys.remove exe with Sys_error _ -> ());
(* Programs whose whole output is fixed. These cover the milestone-2
surface calc-me does not reach — globals, 2-D arrays, places through a
pointer, casts, match with either arm taken, and the value semantics of
spec-memory.md. *)
let outputs ?opt ?dev name path expected =
let exe = compile ?opt ?dev path in
let code, text = run exe None in
if text <> expected || code <> 0 then begin
incr failures;
Printf.printf
"FAIL %s\n got: %S (exit %d)\n wanted: %S (exit 0)\n"
name text code expected
end;
(try Sys.remove exe with Sys_error _ -> ())
in
let values_out = "1\n5\nel\n" in
let machine_out = "12\n30\n2\n2\n3\n3.5\n42\n99\n12\n123\n" in
outputs "value semantics" "programs/values.flan" values_out;
outputs "machine surface" "programs/machine.flan" machine_out;
outputs "unit main exits 0" "programs/unit-main.flan" "ok\n";
(* The prelude's slice algorithms. Every assertion here is over an input a
wrong implementation fails: unsorted with duplicates, negatives and an
odd length; a reverse-sorted slice; and a sort of a subslice whose
neighbours must be untouched, which is the in-place, ptr+len claim
itself. At -O0 as well — a slice parameter is an alloca of a two-word
struct, and mem2reg is exactly what would hide it being copied. *)
let slices_out =
"5 -3 5 0 12 -3 7\n23\n-3\n12\n0\n-1\n99\n\
7 -3 12 0 5 -3 5\n-3 7 12 0 5 -3 5\n\
-3 -3 0 5 5 7 12\n1 2 3 4 5\n\
100 -1 0 4 9 9 200 300\n100 -1 0 4 9 9 200 300\n"
in
outputs "slice algorithms" "programs/slices.flan" slices_out;
outputs ~opt:"-O0" "slice algorithms, -O0" "programs/slices.flan" slices_out;
(* The byte predicates, parse-i64, and the two number helpers. The refused
parse-i64 cases are every shape strtoll answers 0 for — "", "abc",
"12x", "-", " 1" — so a None there is the whole reason the function is
Flan and not the bytes->i64 primitive. The RNG lines pin the actual
sequence off a fixed seed rather than just a range, which is the only
way a later change to the derivation gets caught; rand-u32 itself is
pinned by the sand hash. *)
let text_out =
"tfft\ntfftt\ntfftt\n\
1 -1 -1\n\
0 42 -42 7 9007199254740993\n\
-999 -999 -999 -999 -999\n\
1 -1 0\n\
0 2.5 10 0\n\
11 14 12 14 15\n5 5\n\
0.793725 0.324519 0.0835023\n"
in
outputs "bytes, parsing and numbers" "programs/text.flan" text_out;
outputs ~opt:"-O0" "bytes, parsing and numbers, -O0" "programs/text.flan"
text_out;
(* handler-bind and signal, spec-conditions.md §1 and §2: signal returns
Unit and carries on, an unhandled one is a no-op, a nested frame does
not displace the one outside it, and the stack is restored after. *)
let conditions_out = "0\n3\n23\n3\n1103\n1103\n" in
outputs "conditions" "programs/conditions.flan" conditions_out;
outputs ~opt:"-O0" "conditions, -O0" "programs/conditions.flan" conditions_out;
outputs ~dev:true "conditions, dev" "programs/conditions.flan" conditions_out;
(* restart-case and invoke-restart, §3 to §6: the transfer itself. A
fall-through with nothing handling it, a clause reached from two frames
down, the defer in between running on the way out, an inner frame
shadowing an outer one of the same name, and a handler that returns
normally still transferring nothing. At -O0 as well, because the guard
after every call is control flow the optimiser would otherwise launder;
and as a dev build, where every one of those calls goes through a cell. *)
let restarts_out = "101\n1\n-1\n2\n7\n1010\n101\n105\n-2\n" in
outputs "restarts" "programs/restarts.flan" restarts_out;
outputs ~opt:"-O0" "restarts, -O0" "programs/restarts.flan" restarts_out;
outputs ~dev:true "restarts, dev" "programs/restarts.flan" restarts_out;
(* §2's other half, which cannot be an [outputs] case because it does not
exit 0: a handler runs, returns normally, and has still not answered the
error, so the program stops and names the condition. *)
let exe = compile "programs/error.flan" in
let code, text = run exe None in
if code <> 134 || not (contains text "handler ran")
|| not (contains text "unhandled AssetMissing")
then begin
incr failures;
Printf.printf
"FAIL an unhandled error stops the program\n\
\ got: %S (exit %d)\n wanted: exit 134, naming the condition\n"
text code
end;
(* The raylib FFI, headless. GetColor, rectangle intersection and the
shapes texture need no window, so the whole boundary is exercised
without a display: a struct out of C through an out-pointer, a struct
into C through a pointer, a keyword resolved against an enum, and a
Flan string crossing as ptr+len.
Every case is asymmetric, which is the point. 0x11223344 comes back as
four separate bytes, so a Color is not the little-endian reading of the
packed integer. The intersection of (0,0,10,4) and (6,1,10,10) is
(6,1,4,3), four numbers from four different pairs of fields, so no
permutation of Rectangle survives it. And the shapes texture is stored
or replaced by 1 1 1 1 7 depending on which field is zero, which pins
Texture2D's id and format. Handing raylib a struct and reading it back
would have passed with any of those permuted — storing and returning is
symmetric. What the last case cannot pin, because nothing raylib
computes without a GL context reads them, is width, height and mipmaps
against each other. *)
let raylib_out =
"17\n34\n51\n68\n\
6\n1\n4\n3\n\
7\n13\n17\n2\n4\n3.5\n7.25\n11.5\n13.75\n\
1\n1\n1\n1\n7\n\
7\n0\n17\n2\n4\n"
in
if Sys.command "ldconfig -p 2>/dev/null | grep -q libraylib" = 0 then begin
outputs "raylib ffi, headless" "programs/raylib-ffi.flan" raylib_out;
(* And at -O0, for the reason the rest of the table is: every struct
here crosses as (addr v) on a local, which is the alloca mem2reg
would launder before anyone noticed it was wrong. *)
outputs ~opt:"-O0" "raylib ffi, headless, -O0" "programs/raylib-ffi.flan"
raylib_out
end
else
print_endline "acceptance: skipping the raylib FFI case (no libraylib)";
(* Again at -O0. Everything above runs through mem2reg, which launders a
sloppy alloca; -O0 tests the IR actually emitted, so a disagreement
between the two points at undefined behaviour rather than a typo. *)
(* sand.flan's simulation, headless. This is the milestone-4 acceptance
case: N frames from a seeded PRNG, one hash. It imports the sim package
and not raylib, deliberately — a program that imports raylib links
libraylib on every target, and this one is the version meant to run on
wasm32 too. The hash is reproducible only because rand-f32 is ours. *)
let sand_out = "2256461126764447066\n" in
outputs "sand, headless" "programs/sand-headless.flan" sand_out;
outputs ~opt:"-O0" "sand, headless, -O0" "programs/sand-headless.flan" sand_out;
outputs ~opt:"-O0" "value semantics, -O0" "programs/values.flan" values_out;
outputs ~opt:"-O0" "machine surface, -O0" "programs/machine.flan" machine_out;
(* And once more as a dev build. Every call in one goes through a cell, so
this is the same table asserting the indirection changes nothing before
anything has been redefined — the sand hash especially, since it is the
one result that would notice a call reaching the wrong function. *)
outputs ~dev:true "sand, headless, dev" "programs/sand-headless.flan" sand_out;
outputs ~dev:true "value semantics, dev" "programs/values.flan" values_out;
outputs ~dev:true "machine surface, dev" "programs/machine.flan" machine_out;
(* Bounds checks, NEXT.md item 2. A trap has no result — it has a nonzero
exit and a message on stderr — so it needs a case shape the table above
does not have. What is asserted is the *reason*: the location, and which
index against which length. The line and column are not pinned, because
editing the program should not break the test that reads it. *)
let bounds ?opt () =
let exe = compile ?opt "programs/bounds.flan" in
let traps name arg reason =
let code, text = run exe (Some arg) in
if code <> 134
|| not (contains text "programs/bounds.flan:")
|| not (contains text reason)
then begin
incr failures;
Printf.printf
"FAIL %s\n got: %S (exit %d)\n wanted: %S (exit 134)\n"
name text code reason
end
in
(* Both edges are in bounds and must not trap: the last index of a fixed
array, a slice ending exactly at len, and an empty slice at len. *)
let code, text = run exe (Some "0") in
if text <> "0ello\n" || code <> 0 then begin
incr failures;
Printf.printf "FAIL in-bounds edges\n got: %S (exit %d)\n" text code
end;
traps "at past a fixed array" "3"
"index 3 is out of bounds for length 3";
(* Negative indices sext to a huge unsigned, so the one unsigned
comparison catches them; the message still reports the signed value. *)
traps "at with a negative index" "-1"
"index -1 is out of bounds for length 3";
traps "at past a slice" "9"
"index 9 is out of bounds for length 5";
(* A different lowering — place/Pindex, not At — so it is its own case. *)
traps "set past a fixed array" "7"
"index 7 is out of bounds for length 3";
traps "slice with hi past len" "4"
"slice [4 9) is out of bounds for length 5";
(* Without the lo <= hi test this one would not trap: it would build a
slice of length hi - lo as a huge unsigned, which is worse. *)
traps "slice with a reversed range" "2"
"slice [2 1) is out of bounds for length 5";
(try Sys.remove exe with Sys_error _ -> ())
in
bounds ();
bounds ~opt:"-O0" ();
(* The release build drops them — the calls, that is; the two declarations
stay in the header and LLVM discards the unused ones. Asserted on the IR
rather than by running an unchecked out-of-bounds program, which has no
defined behaviour to assert on. *)
let p =
Reader.read_file "programs/bounds.flan" |> Parse.program |> Check.program
in
if not (contains (Emit.program p) "call void @flan_bounds_fail(") then begin
incr failures;
print_endline "FAIL checks on: no bounds call emitted"
end;
let off = Emit.program ~checks:false p in
if contains off "call void @flan_bounds_fail(" || contains off "call void @flan_slice_fail(" then begin
incr failures;
print_endline "FAIL --no-bounds-checks: a check survived"
end;
if !failures = 0 then print_endline "acceptance: all tests passed"
else begin
Printf.printf "\n%d failure(s)\n" !failures;
exit 1
end
| _ -> print_endline "acceptance: skipped (no clang on PATH)"