Ranks 7, 10 and 19.
A defn whose name is a builtin's is silently unreachable — the dispatch
reaches every builtin arm before it looks in the function table — and the
arity refusal that followed measured the call against the builtin while
pointing at a call the reader had written for their own. The count stays the
builtin's, because the builtin is what runs; the message says so and notes
the definition that is not being reached. The shadowing itself is not
refused: that is a language decision and not a fix pass's to make.
FIX.org recorded and's misdirected caret with three rejected fixes and one
accepted — check_if preferring the arm that is not a compiler temp — and said
it was a check.ml change nobody owned. and's last operand is its then arm and
the sentinel carrying the previous operand's location is its else arm, so the
mismatch landed one operand early. Only and needs it: in an or the chain is
already in the else arm, and with an expectation in hand neither arm is
checked against the other.
'expanding this declaration produced 2 of them' had no antecedent once read
cold. The head of the expanded form is the macro's name and says what
expanded, and the expression form names (do ...).
Joseph Ferano
859e3aa7f4