F3: the unknown-struct-vs-function message overgeneralized a one-case
parser quirk into a language rule that does not exist. (g {:a 1}) compiles
fine -- only the empty map is stolen by is_struct_map's Map [] -> true.
The message now names {} specifically and says why: it is read as the
zero-field struct literal, not "a map literal cannot be passed as an
argument".
F2: the ordering refusal named machine numbers only, when Types.is_comparable
also admits enums and enum-compare.flan orders one with (< k :mid). Both
messages -- equality and ordering -- now name every type each actually
covers.
F1 and F5, together, since both live in the same parse.ml arm: the
rest = [] carve-out that let a single-form dyn map body through
reintroduced the exact bug the earlier fix was for. (defn mx [a $t b $t]
$t {:where (ordered? $t)}) -- a :where clause with nothing after it, what
a moved closing paren produces -- no longer matched, fell through to expr,
and printed "unknown function ordered?" from inside what was meant as a
predicate. A :where map is peeled unconditionally again, whether or not
anything follows it; every other keyword, plus the empty map and any
non-keyword key, is still peeled only when the body has more after it, so
a real single-form dyn map body is still left alone. The comment
justifying the discarded-map refusal claimed a map literal has no side
effects; it does -- {:a (println "hi")} prints, confirmed by running it --
so the reasoning now names the actual problem, a value going unused, not
a false claim about purity.
Closing that F1 hole this way opened two more, both traced by rebuilding
the pre-fix parse.ml and diffing real compiler output rather than
reasoning about it: {.x 1} at a defn body's head used to get its own
message, "a bare map is not an expression", and briefly started getting
"a constraint map is keyword/value pairs" instead, because the broadened
guard no longer required a keyword and started catching the struct-field
shape too. Excluded explicitly, with a comment saying why, so expr's
dedicated diagnostic fires again. And (defn main [] i32 {} 0) and
(defn main [] i32 {"a" 1} 0) -- the empty map and the non-keyword-keyed
map, the two siblings a keyword-only guard could never have caught --
now get their own refusals alongside the keyword case, each pinned with
a rejects_check row, along with the where-with-no-body case and the two
legitimate single-form bodies that must keep compiling.
F6: the acceptance runner's tail already caught every failure on every
path through the binary -- there is no skip branch that bypasses it, and
the no-clang branch runs zero rows -- so last round's at_exit guard and
the FIX.org note both overstated what was broken. Both now say what was
actually true: the exit status was already trustworthy, the guard is
insurance against a future case leaving past the tail instead of through
it, and the other nine test binaries were already sound the same way.
The guard also had a real bug of its own: forcing exit 1 whenever
failures was nonzero would stomp the watchdog's own exit 2 if a hang
followed a few already-failed rows, since Stdlib.exit runs at_exit
handlers LIFO. watchdog.ml now flags when it is the one unwinding, and
test_acceptance.ml's guard defers to it -- shared state for a single
caller, justified by there being no other way for one at_exit handler to
know a sibling handler is already mid-exit with a code of its own to
protect.
Verified every case in this commit by compiling and, where it mattered,
running the actual program -- not by inspecting the arm and assuming.
dune test --force: exit 0, clean grep for FAIL and Fatal error.
Joseph Ferano
87aeb7b0da