flan/runtime
Joseph Ferano 8ce05087c8 flan_dev_result_get was not the seqlock its comment claimed
It read the generation, then a non-atomic length, then returned the buffer
itself — and the agent sent those bytes down a socket some time later, while
the game thread was free to be a hundred bytes into the next value. A seqlock
cannot validate a read that finishes after it returns, so the pointer was the
bug and not the ordering.

Made into a real one rather than documented down to what it guaranteed,
because what it guaranteed was nothing: the generation told the daemon a new
value had arrived and said nothing about whether the bytes it then read were
that value. Writing the honest comment would have left the daemon's only way of
reading a result unsound with a note beside it.

The counter is odd for exactly as long as a value is being written.
flan_dev_result_read copies into the caller's buffer and checks the counter
either side of the copy, retrying if it moved; a reader that loses the race
reports the last complete generation and no bytes, so a daemon polling for a
new value keeps polling rather than being shown half of one. The count handed
out is the number of complete values, so "has it moved" still means what
lib/dev.ml takes it to mean. The agent's buffer is RESULT_MAX, so the copy is
never truncated.

The race itself has no regression test. Arranging it means landing a socket
read inside a render thunk from outside the process, which is the same hook the
snapshot generation wants. What is tested is that eval still reads back the
value it rendered, through test_dev's existing cases.
2026-09-12 10:39:28 +07:00
..