The routing C-x C-e already had, asked of the form C-c C-c already picks:
the top-level form point is in, not the one behind it, so reloading the defn
you are standing in is untouched. Both keys are one command and both route --
a person who writes (+ 1 1) and presses C-c C-c has the complaint that started
this, and splitting them would buy a rule to remember and nothing else.
A prefix on the expression path is a flag, the way C-u C-x C-e's already is:
there is no inside for a position to point at, so C-u and C-u C-u say the one
thing, and it does not stick because the thunk is thrown away.
package is where the two keys disagree, which is the one real finding here.
Parse.expr has no arm refusing it, so C-x C-e's question answers no; Parse.decl
has one, so C-c C-c must keep installing it. flan--defun-heads is that list
plus that head.
The value now goes beside the form, in flan-watch's ghost shape and with the
error overlay's lifetime, because eros and CIDER put it there and the echo
area cannot say which of two forms returned 2. flan-inline-result turns it
off; where the two would overlap the overlay wins and the echo is not also
written. A refusal clears it rather than sitting beside it.
The expression path sends flan--text-at now: an expression does not start at
column 1, and an unpadded snippet put its refusal on line 1 of the file.
Joseph Ferano
9417fdec42