flan/test/programs/slurp.flan
Joseph Ferano 9ce51ba94e One slice over everything with elements, and the warning at the push
as-slice was a warning, not an operation. The input type already decides
which of the two things happens — a Vec can only be borrowed, an array or a
string can only be viewed, and no call site picks between them — so the second
name expressed no choice a reader could make. And it warned at the moment the
view is taken, which is the one moment nothing is wrong; the danger arrives
later, at the push. slice now takes a Vec at all three arities and as-slice
is gone.

(slice v lo) was free, and is the arity the Vec never had: the runtime already
reads a hi of -1 as "to the end", so the tail form passes the caller's lo and
the same -1 — no slot, no length read, no second evaluation. The merge is
entirely in the checker; the Vec path builds the flan_vec_as_slice call it
always built and neither backend has a line about any of it.

A Vec a call returned is refused at every arity, and not for the array's
reason. (slice (mk)) over an array dangles. (slice (make-vec)) does not — the
storage outlives the expression — but the header is a temporary, so nothing
can ever free the block. The refusal says that and names the let.

The name's own refusal sits in ordinary_call after every table, so a program
that defines an as-slice still reaches its own. It reads for somebody who has
never heard of the old name and writes the call back out, spelling each
argument that is a name or a number.

The warning moved to where it bites: BUILT.md gains a section beside the Vec
table and the push row points at it, spec-memory.md's Borrowing says the same.
Investigated and deliberately not built — a diagnostic for a live view at the
push. (reserve v 100) then a slice, a push and a read is correct code under
the contract the spec chose, so any flag on it is a false positive by the
language's own semantics rather than by an approximation. FIX.org has the
finding and the syntactic sketch that does not work.
2026-09-21 09:51:35 +07:00

104 lines
4.4 KiB
Plaintext

;;;; slurp and barf — NEXT.md decisions 2 and 5.
;;;;
;;;; slurp reads a whole file and answers a (Vec u8). It allocates, which is
;;;; why it waited for Vec, and it follows spec-memory.md's rule to the letter:
;;;; no allocating operation returns an error, so there is no Result here and
;;;; no out-parameter anywhere.
;;;;
;;;; Failure signals a condition under a restart, which is the pattern
;;;; StorageExhausted set this session. Two restarts, and they are the pair
;;;; Common Lisp establishes for a file-error:
;;;;
;;;; retry the file may be there now
;;;; use-value [p string] try this other path instead
;;;;
;;;; use-value is a *typed* restart — the second thing this session bought —
;;;; and it is the first one the compiler itself emits. Its parameter is the
;;;; path slot the attempt reads, so the clause body is empty: the invoker's
;;;; argument lands in the slot, the clause falls through, and the loop
;;;; re-attempts against the new path.
;; Handlers cannot see the locals of the function that established them, so the
;; observations are globals — the same shape exhausted.flan uses.
(defonce seen i64)
(defonce last-reason i32)
(defonce last-op i32)
(defonce last-path string)
(defn main [] i32
;; ── The happy path ────────────────────────────────────────────────
(let [v (slurp "programs/assets/a.txt")]
(println (len v)) ; 13
(print (string (slice v))) ; hello from a
(free v))
;; Byte-exact, the same as an embed: nothing here decodes anything.
(let [v (slurp "programs/assets/raw.bin")]
(println (len v)) ; 4
(println (at v 0)) ; 0
(println (at v 2)) ; 255
(free v))
;; ── use-value: a missing file, answered with another path ─────────
;; The textbook case. The handler does not know what slurp was going to do
;; with the bytes and does not have to: it names a file that is there and
;; the read resumes as if that had been asked for all along.
(handler-bind
[(FileError [c]
(set seen (+ seen 1))
(set last-reason (.reason c))
(set last-op (.op c))
(set last-path (.path c))
(invoke-restart 'use-value "programs/assets/b.bin"))]
(let [v (slurp "programs/assets/does-not-exist")]
(println (len v)) ; 3
(println (string (slice v))) ; BBB
(free v)))
(println seen) ; 1
(println (= last-reason file-missing)) ; true
(println (= last-op file-op-read)) ; true
;; The condition carries the path that actually failed, not the one that
;; eventually worked — the handler is told what it is answering about.
(println last-path) ; programs/assets/does-not-exist
;; ── barf, and reading back what it wrote ──────────────────────────
(barf "slurp-out.txt" (bytes-view "round trip\n"))
(let [v (slurp "slurp-out.txt")]
(println (len v)) ; 11
(print (string (slice v))) ; round trip
(free v))
;; barf's own failure signals the same condition with op = write. A directory
;; that does not exist is the reachable case on every platform.
(set seen 0)
(handler-bind
[(FileError [c]
(set seen (+ seen 1))
(set last-op (.op c))
(invoke-restart 'use-value "slurp-out.txt"))]
(barf "no-such-dir/x.txt" (bytes-view "second\n")))
(println seen) ; 1
(println (= last-op file-op-write)) ; true
(let [v (slurp "slurp-out.txt")]
(print (string (slice v))) ; second
(free v))
;; ── retry: the file was not there, so the handler makes it ────────
;; The other restart, and the one use-value cannot stand in for: here the
;; path is right and the world is wrong. The handler fixes the world and
;; re-attempts the *same* request, which is exactly what retry means for a
;; failed allocation too.
(set seen 0)
(handler-bind
[(FileError [c]
(set seen (+ seen 1))
(set last-reason (.reason c))
(barf "slurp-made.txt" (bytes-view "made by the handler\n"))
(invoke-restart 'retry))]
(let [v (slurp "slurp-made.txt")]
(print (string (slice v))) ; made by the handler
(free v)))
(println seen) ; 1
(println (= last-reason file-missing)) ; true
0)