A type provider produces a struct and a reader over it, and a struct per
nesting level in the data. Expansion is form-for-form, so one call could only
ever become one declaration — which was enough while every macro expanded to an
expression. A top-level (do ...) is now its items, spliced in place, after
expansion and before the declaration walk. Nobody writes one in a file, and the
single-declaration entry point says so by name for anyone who tries.
And (compile-error "...") is what a macro expands to when it has to refuse. The
prelude's `unless` records the gap: a macro has no error facility, so a
malformed call answers a name nothing defines and the report is the right place
with the wrong sentence. A name carries a name. A type provider's refusals are
all sentence — the third element of this vector is a string where the first two
were integers, at line 3 column 9 of a file the compiler is not reading — and
no symbol an expansion could invent holds that. Loc.from_macro already stamps
the call site onto the expansion, so the location is the form the author wrote.
A builtin because it has to fail while checking: a declared function would
compile, link and run, and the compile it was meant to stop would have
succeeded.
Joseph Ferano
a2004ae7a6