The unwinding handler, which spec-conditions.md named and left unwritten while
it asked whether the thing should be a macro over the two operators that were
already here. It should. (handler-case B [(T [c] A)]) is checked as
(restart-case (handler-bind [(T [c] (invoke-restart 'R c))] B) (R [c T] A))
with R a name the form makes up for itself, which is Common Lisp's own
definition of the operator and means neither backend needed a line.
What that buys is not economy, it is the correctness of the parts nobody can
see. The defers between the signal and the form run, and the allocator a
with-allocator rebound is put back, because a transfer already does both for
every frame it leaves. The body and every clause agree on one type, because a
restart-case's body and clauses already do, and a clause that disagrees is
refused with the same message an if with disagreeing arms gets. A condition no
clause lists installs no frame that matches it and goes on outward untouched.
A clause sees the establishing function's locals, which a handler-bind clause
cannot, because a restart clause runs where it was written.
The body comes first and the clauses after it, the opposite of handler-bind's
order: one reads as something put around a body and the other as a body with
answers hung off the end of it. The restart the two halves meet over is named
after the function and numbered within it, and it has to be unique per form,
because two nested handler-cases sharing a name would have the inner frame
shadow the outer one and land a condition at the wrong place.
The refusals name handler-case rather than the machinery underneath it, which
is why check_handler_bind and the restart clauses now take the word the reader
wrote. A break loop entered under a handler-case still lists the made-up
restart, and taking it there is refused loudly rather than answered wrongly;
hiding it would mean a field in a frame layout spelled out in three files.
The survey program runs the same under LLVM, at -O0 and under --x86: normal
completion, a caught condition, one nobody listed passing through with the body
carrying on, both defers on the way out, the two nestings against handler-bind,
a clause that signals and is caught outside the form it belongs to, and a
with-allocator whose restore is on the transfer path.
Joseph Ferano
a251dca67f