Joseph Ferano a70cfadd94 A bad frame costs one request, not the connection
Two orderings in the reply reader, and both of them were permanent. A frame
whose header arrived and whose body did not fell through the wait loop into
`flan-dev--extract-reply', where `byte-to-position' signalled a wrong-type
error on a position past the end of the buffer -- so the timeout message the
function goes to some trouble to word was never the one anybody read, and the
header stayed at the front of the buffer, where the next request took it as
its own and every request after that was answered by the one before it. The
body deadline is tested again now rather than trusted, and the dead frame is
erased: the timeout is said in the words meant for it, and the connection is
back in step. The header deadline still erases nothing, because a partial
header is a valid prefix of a reply that is merely slow.

The other is `flan-dev--extract-reply' reading the payload before deleting it,
so a payload that would not read was never consumed and the same bytes
signalled again on every later request. It is deleted first now. That makes
the frame gone whether or not the read succeeded, which `flan-watch--tick' has
to know: it cleared its pending flag only on a reply it got back, and would
otherwise wait for ever for one no longer in the buffer.
2026-09-18 07:29:34 +07:00
..