err-too-deep was the one error code nothing observed. The message is the least
of it: the plausible wrong version is `>` where the guard wants `>=`, which
writes one element past a [32 i32] and traps at exit 134 rather than answering
anything. 33 opening brackets is the input that separates them, and it is the
whole justification for a fixed array instead of a growable stack — the place
this lane pushes hardest against having no allocator.
`.5` reads as a float here and does not in EDN, where a number must start with
a digit and `.` is a legal symbol-start byte. That makes it a reinterpretation
of a token that is already legal as something else, which is exactly what the
house rule says to name rather than leave to be discovered, so it is written
beside the refusals.
Also: every symbol in the table was lowercase, so the A-Z half of alpha? was
unexercised and a version missing it passed. Enemy/Goblin in an existing dump
rather than a new case. And a line under "Internal helpers" saying the heading
is intent and not enforcement — a package has no visibility, so edn/scan-atom
is as callable as edn/next, the same way rl/get-color-raw is.
Both new cases verified by mutation: the depth guard traps, and alpha? without
its uppercase range fails Enemy/Goblin.
Joseph Ferano
ad092d7d02