DISCUSS.org's "need a value-producing array constructor": the author
wanted grid filled with 255 as part of its declaration and could not
write it. (array n T) produces the zeroed array only, and dotimes is
Unit, so it can mutate a place that already exists but cannot be the
initialiser expression -- which has to produce the whole value in one
go. The grid was declared zeroed and filled in main instead.
Two forms, both expressions, both any rank:
(array-fill [rows cols] 255) every element that value
(array-gen [rows cols] cell) every element (cell i j)
Spelled apart rather than one form dispatching on the third element's
type, because an array *of* function values is a thing to want and one
form would have to decide whether (array-fill [4] f) meant four copies
of f or four calls of it.
The dimensions are read in Parse, and that is the whole reason they are
recognised there: handed through as an ordinary call, [rows cols] is an
array literal of two names, and where those names are defconsts it is a
perfectly good two-element array of integers -- the wrong reading, and a
silent one. Read in Parse they are the same len the [n T] type spelling
takes, resolved by the same array_len, with one extra condition of their
own: the fill counts in i32 like every index in the language, so a
dimension no i32 can reach has no loop that could end.
The lowering is a loop over a slot, not an aggregate. Tast.Arr is the
node the backends have and both build it element by element from a list
as long as the array; a fill of [600 [800 u8]] is half a million
elements and there is no list to be had. So these bind the array to a
slot, zero it, run one While per dimension writing through Set of a
Pindex, and answer with the slot -- While, Set and Pindex, which is the
argument check_loop already makes for recur. Nothing new reaches a
backend and all three get the form with no edit. The value stays
value-like: the slot is the form's own, and the Local at the end copies
out the way any array-typed expression does.
Row-major is pinned, not incidental: the first dimension is the
outermost loop, and a generator that counts observes it. The fill value
and the generator value are each bound once before any loop starts, so
(array-fill [n] (next-id)) is one call and n copies of its answer.
What falls out for the defvar the note was written about, and neither
half is a carve-out:
(defvar grid [rows [cols u8]] (array-fill [rows cols] 255))
is the spelling that works -- a typed global with a computed
initialiser, which is the startup-lifted path with the init-once guard
that defvar already had, so the fill runs once and the value survives a
re-run like any other computed one. The three-element spelling means
what the 2026-09-20 rule says it means: not a type, so a dyn global, and
a typed fixed array crosses into dyn only as a view of storage that
outlives the view. A freshly built array is a temporary, so it is
refused -- by the element rule where the elements are themselves an
array, by the lifetime rule where they are one of the three scalars a
view carries. Both refusals are the ones any other temporary gets.
The type an array-fill builds never goes through resolve, so resolve's
own guard is asked again where it is built: a fixed array of function
values would be zeroed, and a zeroed function value is a null pointer.
Joseph Ferano
d4def945a9