Joseph Ferano dfb02ee26a A Flan struct is a JS object, and the memory model does not come along
lib/js.ml lowers the same checked Tast the other two backends take to one
CommonJS file, by object mapping rather than linear memory: docs/DISCUSS.md
item 5 settled that fork before this was written, and item 5's consequence is
the whole shape of the file. Object mapping means the host's collector owns
every value, so there is no (Ptr T), no free, no arena and no allocator, and a
program that uses one is refused by name with a location rather than compiled
badly.

flan build --target=js leaves Build.executable through its own two lines,
before anything that assumes a clang: there is no object to compile and no
linker to run. --dev, --debug, --sanitize and --x86 are refused there rather
than swallowed. Js.Unsupported exits 3 beside X86.Unsupported, so a sweep can
count refused-by-name apart from did-not-compile.

What runs end to end: integer and float arithmetic with the normalisation each
width needs, let, if, while with break and continue, calls, function values,
structs, fixed arrays, slices, unions, options, match, and println through the
same structural printer the other backends walk.

Value semantics is the trap the object mapping sets and the reason the header
carries a section on it. A Flan struct and a fixed array copy on assignment and
a JS object does not, so every site emit.ml memcpys emits a generated
Point$copy here. Fable's JS backend faces the same question for F# structs and
answers it the other way -- it inserts no clone, and its Rust backend does --
so the divergence is deliberate and the survey pins it.
2026-09-17 22:05:25 +07:00
..