defer is a compile-time construct: the cleanup is copied into every exit
path of the function. That is why a loop body and a branch are refused —
a loop body's would fire once at function exit rather than once per
iteration, and a branch would have to express "maybe registered", which
a form copied into every exit path or into none cannot say.
A let is neither. It is not a frame here: its bindings are function slots
like any other and nothing is released at scope exit, so a let at the top
level of a function body has exactly the function's extent and a defer
written in it always registers. It was refused for a reason that does not
apply to it. A let nested inside such a let has the same extent and the
same permission; a let inside a while or an if has the loop's or the
arm's, and inherits the refusal.
The permission is granted again before every form of a body, never once
around the body: check withdraws it as it starts, so granting it once
would let the first defer through and refuse the second — and two
resources acquired in one let is the case this exists for. defer-let.flan
covers that one specifically, along with nesting, interleaved
registration order across the let boundary, and an early return.
The two refusals that stay now name what blocks them.
Joseph Ferano
e041b2f26c