Joseph Ferano e3565b30e8 The survey was counting the defers, not watching them
Every mark it left was an addition, and addition commutes, so a backend that
ran the defers outermost-first produced byte-identical output and the row that
was supposed to be watching the order could not have told. The claim was in the
comments and not in the numbers. cleanup.flan already had the device for this —
a shift rather than a sum — so the log here is a digit trace now, and the two
frames under a catch read 12 where a wrong order reads 21.

Rewriting the trace made room for the three behaviours that worked and nothing
pinned. A return inside a clause is an ordinary return from the function that
wrote the form, because that is where a clause runs: it leaves through the
function's own exit, runs the defer registered there after the two the unwind
already ran, and leaves the handler stack empty behind it, which the bare
signal that follows in main is the check on. A defer inside a clause is refused
for the reason every nested form is refused one. And a handler-case inside a
defer works, because a defer may not start a transfer that leaves it and this
one begins and ends its own.

The program is registered with the sanitizers, where the interesting failure is
not the heap but a handler or restart frame left on a stack pointing into an
alloca that has gone — an output comparison cannot see that until something
much later calls through it. It is clean; it was also leaking sixteen bytes out
of the vector main allocates to prove the allocator context came back, which is
the test's own litter and is freed now.

docs/PORTING.md ranked handler-case as one site handler-bind covers. It still
is one site, and handler-bind still covers it, but it is no longer the closer
translation: a catch block is assumed everywhere it is written to see the
locals around it, and only the clause that runs at the form does.

The handler clauses are lifted left to right rather than by List.map, whose
order is unspecified. Each lift names itself after the count already on the
list, so an order nobody chose would number the clauses of one handler-bind
differently between builds, and those names go into a redefinition module.
2026-09-19 21:13:03 +07:00
..
2026-09-11 20:11:01 +07:00
2026-09-11 20:11:01 +07:00
2026-09-11 20:11:01 +07:00