Item 3, and the reason the backend was written. Until now --x86 was read only
by flan build's argument list; the daemon built both halves through LLVM, so
none of this reached the dev loop at all.
The choice is a session setting, not a per-command flag, and it is spelled
exactly as [debug] already is -- one field on Session.t, set once in Dev.start,
carried on every change the session emits. session.ml's comment on [debug]
already gives the reason and it is the same one: the modules have to match the
process they are loaded into. Session.redefinition is the single place that
picks a backend, so the six call sites cannot disagree and the refusal has one
home. Session.change carries the answer beside the text, so the builder and the
text can never come from two different decisions.
There is no fallback and there must not be one. X86.redefinition refusing a form
is reported to the editor; quietly building an LLVM module instead is precisely
the crossed pair flan.abi.x86 exists to refuse at dlopen. A refusal reaches the
editor as a diagnostic like any other -- X86.Unsupported is re-raised as a
Loc.Error at the form it is about, because every caller already handles that and
none handled the other, and a session that died on the first unsupported form
would be worse than one that says so and stays up.
flan reload got the same flag at the same time. A command that could build a
module for a host the other backend compiled is how the crossed pair was
reachable from the CLI at all; the aggregate handoff's two-line reproduction no
longer has a second half.
And the finding: flan dev --x86 refuses the merged daemon. A merged build is the
program and the compiler in one process, and the compiler expands macros by
dlopening a module Build.macro_module made through Emit.program, cached on disk
by the macro source rather than by the backend. The merged host is linked
-rdynamic so a redefinition module can reach its cells, which also exports every
flan.* body it has -- so the macro module's own copy of a prelude function is
interposed by the host's. With an LLVM host nobody notices. With an --x86 host
the caller is LLVM and the body it lands in is this backend's, and the process
dies inside flan.[clamp] during the first macro expansion, before the program
has started. flan.abi.x86 does not catch it and was never meant to: a macro
module deliberately neither defines nor requires a marker. The honest fix is
hidden visibility on a macro module's Flan bodies, which changes the cached
object for both backends and wants a lane of its own. Until then the refusal
names the mechanism and the remedy, and --two-process has no such meeting.
start_merged keeps its --x86 plumbing, unreachable for now, because it is the
half that is right and will be wanted the day the macro module is fixed.
test_dev.ml drives an --x86 daemon through C-c C-c, C-x C-e, a literal, a new
defvar with a value of its own and a new defn, and asserts (twice fresh) is 82 --
which only holds if both registry lookups resolved. The merged refusal is
asserted there too. bin/main.ml learned to print a bare Failure as a sentence
rather than an uncaught exception and its backtrace.
Joseph Ferano
f182fb4728