The fifth predicate: integer? admits every integer kind and no float,
entails numeric? (and through it ordered? and equal?), and gates what
only integers support — the bitwise fold asks for it, the shifts admit
a bounded variable under it, and the float literal in an integer? body
is refused in the bound's own words. The literal arm needed nothing:
the entailment admits an integer constant under either bound.
abs-i32 and abs-i64 collapse into one integer?-bounded generic whose
i32/i64 copies even keep the old symbols; abs-f32/abs-f64 stay as the
float spellings because the right float abs is a sign-bit clear no
integer body spells, and (abs 1.5) now refuses naming the bound — the
where clause is checked before the name-collision check, which used to
answer that call with 'abs-f64 is already defined'.
Mixed widths at one $t join at the wider type now, in either argument
order — the author reversed the refuse-both rule on 2026-09-20. A
joinless pair is deferred and re-asked against the final binding, so a
later wider argument settles u32-vs-i32; u64-vs-i64 still refuses, and
a container-bound variable still binds exactly. The out-widened
arguments catch up through the ordinary Cast.
Two review follow-ups folded in: a struct field's unknown-lowercase
message stops suggesting a parameter vector it does not have, and the
tyvar-at-dyn message says defgeneric/defmethod in words instead of a
schematic that does not compile.
Joseph Ferano
f71cc40bb5