The author: "I think I prefer length over len, because then I'll use len as
the variable name". One arm in check.ml, one row in the table beside it, and
every (len x) in lib, test, examples, vendor, spike, docs, web, emacs,
plan.org and NEXT.md rewritten.
Shadowing and builtin/ had already taken most of the sting out: a (defn len
...) was legal and won in its own file, and builtin/len reached past it. What
was left is that len was still a builtin — the defn earned a warning, and a
wrapper had to say builtin/ at every inner call. Now there is nothing under
the short name: len is an ordinary identifier in every position, which is
what (let [len (length xs)] ...) wants.
length takes over as shadowing's worked example rather than the feature
losing one. shadow-builtin.flan, builtin-qualified.flan, pkgs/shadowed and the
builtin/ rows in test_flan move to it and go on testing shadowing.
A call to a len nothing defines is answered where an unknown function is,
after every table and after the shadowing guard, so a program with its own len
never reaches it. The sentence is said rather than guessed at — len and length
are three edits apart and the did-you-mean's net is one — and the call is
written back out through spell_arg, as-slice's spelling lifted out of it and
now shared, so what is printed compiles.
sand.flan:33 still calls the old name and is the author's to change; until it
does, test_acceptance and test_session abort there. Both were run green
against a copy with that one line changed. FIX.org says so.
(vec-new dyn) is not a (Vec dyn). At milestone 1 the heterogeneous container is
the dyn runtime's own object and its type is dyn like everything else the
runtime hands back, which is what lets push, at and len on it be the dyn
operations instead of a type-erased Vec over eight-byte elements. It takes no
allocator, and the refusal says why: the storage has to be storage the collector
already knows about, where a Flan Vec's block would hold roots inside memory the
collector does not own.
len answers an i32 and at answers a dyn. The asymmetry is deliberate -- a length
is what an index loop compares against, and handing back a boxed number would
make (< i (len xs)) a dyn comparison and two allocations an iteration.
The operand-order bug, which the first test could not see because both its
operands were dyn: (+ n x) over a typed n and a dyn x threaded i64 into the
second check, expect did what an annotation site had asked for and unboxed, and
the result was a machine add of a value the runtime was never asked about -- the
program trapping on a float instead of promoting it, with nothing in the source
to say why. (+ x n) boxed correctly, so it was visible in one operand order
only. binary now takes dyn_ok from the operators that have a dyn lowering and
checks both operands on their own terms, which is safe exactly when neither
needs an expectation to check -- a literal still takes the other's type, and a
keyword still gets one, since :lo has no meaning without it.
Cast had no bool arms, so the bool boundary failed to emit; reachability hid it,
because the program that used it dropped the function. dyn does not cross to C:
it is one word and would have passed as an integer, and C has no way to ask what
the word means. A condition may not carry one either, nor hold one in a field --
a payload crosses a handler boundary and has to stay rooted across the transfer,
which is the collector's question and milestone 2's.
