The author: "I think I prefer length over len, because then I'll use len as
the variable name". One arm in check.ml, one row in the table beside it, and
every (len x) in lib, test, examples, vendor, spike, docs, web, emacs,
plan.org and NEXT.md rewritten.
Shadowing and builtin/ had already taken most of the sting out: a (defn len
...) was legal and won in its own file, and builtin/len reached past it. What
was left is that len was still a builtin — the defn earned a warning, and a
wrapper had to say builtin/ at every inner call. Now there is nothing under
the short name: len is an ordinary identifier in every position, which is
what (let [len (length xs)] ...) wants.
length takes over as shadowing's worked example rather than the feature
losing one. shadow-builtin.flan, builtin-qualified.flan, pkgs/shadowed and the
builtin/ rows in test_flan move to it and go on testing shadowing.
A call to a len nothing defines is answered where an unknown function is,
after every table and after the shadowing guard, so a program with its own len
never reaches it. The sentence is said rather than guessed at — len and length
are three edits apart and the did-you-mean's net is one — and the call is
written back out through spell_arg, as-slice's spelling lifted out of it and
now shared, so what is printed compiles.
sand.flan:33 still calls the old name and is the author's to change; until it
does, test_acceptance and test_session abort there. Both were run green
against a copy with that one line changed. FIX.org says so.
A bare {.field v} had its refusal in Parse.expr, before any checking, so a
defn whose return type was the only place the struct's name appeared could
not build one. The refusal moves to Check: Parse builds an Ast.Bare out of
the same struct_fields the named form uses, and check_bare reads the type
name off the expectation and hands that very list to check_struct. ZII, the
unknown-field refusal and the duplicate-field refusal are therefore not
copies of the named form's rules but the named form's rules.
Braces at a dyn want are the dyn map literal and stay exactly that. A
.field-keyed brace was never part of that spelling, and at a dyn want it is
refused by name rather than given a second meaning.
(Cell 1 2) is the other half, and it is character-for-character an ordinary
call, so only the symbol table separates them. It is decided on the last arm
of named_call, after a local of function type, a generic and the function
table -- so a defclass constructor, which is a real defn, resolves above it
and is untouched. Arity is exact: ZII is what the braces do, and a positional
list cannot say which field it left out, so it is not allowed to leave one
out. The refusal names the first field it did not reach and points at the
spelling that does mean "zero the rest".
Both are gone before any backend sees them -- Tast.Make either way -- and the
three acceptance rows print the same lines to say so.
