"Is there a way to do dotimes or a loop in reverse?" — the answer was a
hand-written let plus set. Now it is (dotimes [i 9 -1 -1]).
Three arities: [i n], [i start stop], [i start stop step]. The stop is
exclusive in all of them, so [i 0 n] is [i n] — one rule, not two — and a
negative step counts down, testing with > instead of <.
A literal step of 0 is refused where it is written. One that is only a value
cannot be, so the condition asks the sign first and 0 falls out of it as a
loop that runs no times: terminating and deterministic, and free, because a
literal step still emits the single comparison it always did.
Each bound is evaluated once, left to right, before the counter exists: the
start into the counter, the stop into the hidden slot it always had, the
step into one of its own unless it is a literal.
Still a special form, still a Let and a While with the step in the latch, so
neither backend learned anything — the new program prints the same thing
under --x86 and at -O0. load.ml's Form-level walk had to learn more than one
bound for the same reason parse.ml did; it is part of this feature and not a
bug that was sitting there, because before this a three-bound dotimes was a
parse error long before that walk could reach it.
