3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
9a820d86cd Sweep every field label from the colon spelling to the dot
The script is in tools/ rather than thrown away, because two lanes are
writing Flan in the old spelling right now and their files need the same
pass at merge.

It works on forms, not on text: a keyword becomes a dot only where it sits
in a field-label position inside a brace, so an enum member in value
position, a map key inside an EDN string and a type-position {K V} are all
left alone. :keys keeps its colon -- it names no field.
2026-09-12 14:47:54 +07:00
96ab4c9cf0 Retire the per-type printers, since print says all of it
print-str, print-i64, print-f64, print-bytes, print-line and newline leave
the prelude. print and println are the whole printing surface now, and print
is the better call at every one of the sites that used them: it is the same
structural walk without the newline, so the no-newline case the family was
kept for is covered, and it takes the value as it is. The old print-i64
forced an explicit (i64 x) at every call site, because this language widens
nothing implicitly; that cast is gone from 127 places.

Dropping it moves one answer. hash-grid returns u64, and the cast through
the signed printer showed sand-headless's hash as -2851001042534928384.
print routes a u64 through flan_u64_to_bytes, so it now prints
15595743031174623232 — the same 64 bits, read as the unsigned number they
are. The pinned expectation follows the correction.

test-flan-dev.el and test_session.ml both reached for print-line as "a name
the prelude has"; they reach for rand-seed instead.
2026-09-12 05:32:25 +07:00
4f0b1012e8 Three ways to pass the checker and die afterwards
Found by a read-only audit of emit.ml's failwith sites, each of which is a claim
that the checker guarantees something. Three of those claims were false, and
every one failed in the shape NEXT.md calls the worst available: type checks,
then dies with no source location.

An enum comparison is lowered now rather than refused. Types.is_comparable
already admits an enum, so the checker was stating an intent the backend never
honoured - (= k :a) is the first thing anyone writes with an enum, and it raised
Failure("comparison on K"). An enum is an i32 at run time, so all six
operators are an icmp. Signed, because (defenum K [a -1]) is accepted and an
unsigned compare would call -1 the largest member.

A union in a type position is refused instead. Constructing a union value and
reading a field of one were already refused, so nothing could ever be done with
such a value - only the declaration got through, and it reached clang as a
reference to an undefined %"U", which is a link error naming an emitted symbol
with the source location long gone.

A function type annotation is refused too. The function *value* was refused
where it is written; the annotation was refused nowhere, so (defn f [g (Fn []
i32)]) died with "no layout for". It now sits beside the Map line directly
above it, which is the same shape of not-yet.

The audit also found the sentence that covered the last two: NEXT.md and
check.ml's header both claim unions and function values are rejected by name.
That is true of values and false of types, which is exactly the gap the two
findings lived in.
2026-09-11 20:21:33 +07:00