3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
d6fc15474b The count is length, so len is a name a program can have
The author: "I think I prefer length over len, because then I'll use len as
the variable name". One arm in check.ml, one row in the table beside it, and
every (len x) in lib, test, examples, vendor, spike, docs, web, emacs,
plan.org and NEXT.md rewritten.

Shadowing and builtin/ had already taken most of the sting out: a (defn len
...) was legal and won in its own file, and builtin/len reached past it. What
was left is that len was still a builtin — the defn earned a warning, and a
wrapper had to say builtin/ at every inner call. Now there is nothing under
the short name: len is an ordinary identifier in every position, which is
what (let [len (length xs)] ...) wants.

length takes over as shadowing's worked example rather than the feature
losing one. shadow-builtin.flan, builtin-qualified.flan, pkgs/shadowed and the
builtin/ rows in test_flan move to it and go on testing shadowing.

A call to a len nothing defines is answered where an unknown function is,
after every table and after the shadowing guard, so a program with its own len
never reaches it. The sentence is said rather than guessed at — len and length
are three edits apart and the did-you-mean's net is one — and the call is
written back out through spell_arg, as-slice's spelling lifted out of it and
now shared, so what is printed compiles.

sand.flan:33 still calls the old name and is the author's to change; until it
does, test_acceptance and test_session abort there. Both were run green
against a copy with that one line changed. FIX.org says so.
2026-09-21 11:58:56 +07:00
2e203f64b8 bytes copies, bytes-view aliases, and a dev-session segfault parks
The INSERTIONSORT crash, all three rulings (FIX.org 2026-09-20):

- (bytes s) allocates a writable copy through the allocator surface —
  context or (bytes s a), StorageExhausted with retry, a registry note in
  dev builds (flan_bytes_dup, lowered like vec-new). (bytes-view s) is the
  old zero-cost reinterpret, renamed, read-only by convention; every
  in-repo reader swept over to it. (string b) unchanged.
- String constants were already read-only on both backends at -O0; now
  pinned — bytes-copy.flan rows on LLVM/-O0/--x86, and dies_segv rows
  asserting the write-through-view trap on both backends.
- A dev build installs a SIGSEGV/SIGBUS handler by the same dev-only
  constructor slot that arms the registry: one line naming the address and
  the innermost frame, then the trap-hook park — stopped, not dead, the
  daemon serving. No agent: message and re-raise. Release builds untouched.
  Pinned by trap_park over dev-segv.flan.
2026-09-20 23:12:42 +07:00
dc34c62ce0 defjson, which shares the design and not a line of the code
vendor:json depends on vendor:edn for nothing, and borrowing a shape walk
across that line would be a dependency for the sake of a resemblance. What
carries over is the shape of the answer — one walk giving a type, the
declarations that type needs and the expression that reads one; a refusal
carried in a field rather than raised; a typed one-line constructor per
collection; and a compile-error wrapped in a defn nothing calls.

What is genuinely different is four things. Strings go through string-of and
never through .text: .text is the raw interior with escapes undecoded, so a
field read off it would hold a backslash and an n where the file meant a
newline — which is the first two lines of the acceptance output and the reason
they are two. Commas and colons are tokens rather than whitespace. An object's
keys are strings, so a key has to be refused when it is not a name a program
could write, and refused again when it carries an escape: the generated reader
compares against the bytes as written, which costs no allocation per key and is
only the same question when the name is written plainly. And there are no sets,
so there is no map-key path and no fixed array — every collection is a (Vec T)
and defjson is the smaller of the two by half.

JSON has no integer type; the tokenizer draws the line at whether a number has
a fraction or an exponent, which is the only line there is, so 1 derives i64
and 1.0 derives f64. That is the file's own distinction and the honest one to
take.

@x86 matches on it and @sanitize is clean.
2026-09-19 06:41:57 +07:00