1 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
fff4f5d985 One source, two outcomes: barf is refused on the web and says so
programs/web-files.flan is built for both targets from the same text and
neither build reads the target anywhere in parse.ml or check.ml. On the
desktop it writes the file and says so; in the browser barf signals a
FileError the program handles, naming the file and reason 4,
file-unsupported. The whole of the difference is one #ifdef in
flan_rt.c, which is where the host ABI is already implemented twice.

The web case is run under node rather than inspected. An artifact-shape
assertion would say nothing about what decision 2 actually bought —
that a program on the web is told its write did not happen instead of
quietly losing it — so the test asserts the refusal is printed and that
the desktop's success line is absent. A silent no-op would have taken
that branch, which is the outcome the decision rules out by name.

The same program embeds a file and prints it, because that is the half
needing no filesystem and no host ABI: the line is identical on both
targets and is the answer for assets a web build has to carry.
2026-09-12 11:41:24 +07:00