Three things stood between the flagship program and the web target, and each
is answered here rather than worked around.
The brush was a path. (rl/load-texture "brush.png") hands raylib a filename to
open, and a bare relative path means nothing on a target with no filesystem.
It is (embed "brush.png") now, decoded through a new binding —
LoadImageFromMemory, declared (Ptr u8) plus an explicit count because the shim
generator refuses a slice parameter and says so, with a Flan wrapper taking
the slice apart exactly as collision-point-poly? and load-font-ex already do.
One decode now serves both textures: the unflipped upload first, then
ImageFlipHorizontal in place, then the mirrored one. load-texture and
load-image lose their only call site in this repository; that is deliberate,
because a path-based load is the thing that cannot work here.
A package's C may now be addressed to one target, the way a link line already
could. A .c file may carry a tag before its extension — flan_agent.web.c — and
on that target it is compiled and *replaces* the untagged file of the same
base name. Replacement rather than plain tagging, so that teaching a package
about a new target is additive: the file that was right on three targets is
not renamed to say so. Selection is in Build and not in Load, for the reason
select_lflags gives.
The dev agent on the web is a no-op, and the reasoning is written at length in
vendor/agent/flan_agent.web.c. Short version: the agent is a socket server and
a browser has no sockets, so the missing <sys/time.h> was the surface and not
the cause. Refusing vendor:agent on a web target was the other candidate and
is ruled out by arithmetic — Flan has no conditional compilation, sand.flan
calls agent/start unconditionally, Reach cannot prune a package something
reachable calls into, so a refusal means the program does not build for the
browser at all. This does not contradict the `barf` decision made earlier
today. `barf` is asked to make something durable, and a no-op returns success
to a program that now believes bytes are on disk. The agent is asked to accept
redefinitions, and on the web there is no editor, no socket and no session —
--dev is refused by name on every wasm target — so there is nothing to lose.
sand.flan already says the same of a native release build at the call site.
test/test_web.ml builds sand.flan for the browser and reads the module for
brush.png's own bytes, whole. Not "IHDR": stb_image carries that string itself,
linked in from raylib, so it would pass on a build where the embed emitted
nothing. It is not run — node has no DOM, so main reaches InitWindow and dies
inside glfwInit on `window is not defined`, which says the module is live and
nothing about whether the canvas paints.
test/dune gains brush.png, because an embed is read by the checker and the
headless case reaches sand.flan through ../../ from a sandboxed _build.
test_session's C-c C-k case now passes ~origin, which is what both editor
paths already send; omitting it was testing a request nobody makes.
dune test is green. Docs follow in the next commit.
programs/web-files.flan is built for both targets from the same text and
neither build reads the target anywhere in parse.ml or check.ml. On the
desktop it writes the file and says so; in the browser barf signals a
FileError the program handles, naming the file and reason 4,
file-unsupported. The whole of the difference is one #ifdef in
flan_rt.c, which is where the host ABI is already implemented twice.
The web case is run under node rather than inspected. An artifact-shape
assertion would say nothing about what decision 2 actually bought —
that a program on the web is told its write did not happen instead of
quietly losing it — so the test asserts the refusal is printed and that
the desktop's success line is absent. A silent no-op would have taken
that branch, which is the outcome the decision rules out by name.
The same program embeds a file and prints it, because that is the half
needing no filesystem and no host ABI: the line is identical on both
targets and is the answer for assets a web build has to carry.
Each of the four cases asserted only that the message named the target. Every
one of those paths meets "web: no emcc on PATH" first on a machine with no
emscripten, which also names the target — so on exactly the machine where none
of the refusals ran, all four would have reported that they did. Each case now
names the phrase it expects.
test_web.ml never opens a browser and never will. What it asserts is the shape
a browser needs — three files, a module that starts with the wasm magic, a
page that references its own JS and carries the canvas — plus the one
execution available without a DOM: node runs the emitted JS and gets "ok".
For raylib it builds core-basic-window.flan unchanged, which is the claim, and
then reads the module for the two things that would be false if the mechanism
were wrong: an asyncify_start_unwind export, and a glViewport import that can
only have come from raylib's web platform. Import and export names are plain
strings in the binary, so this needs no wasm reader.
Both halves probe rather than assume, the way the wasm32 case does: emscripten
may not be installed and the raylib archive is not in the tree, and a missing
piece is a skip with the reason.
The four refusals are asserted by name — --dev, --debug, --sanitize,
Build.shared, and flan run --target=web from the CLI — because "it falls out
of the existing predicate" is the kind of thing that stops being true quietly.
