7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
d9fa0f2d35 Revert "The compiler's own dlopen, a macro thunk ABI, and Form as a union"
This reverts commit 709f292a694a7f634b807980c1c5b6e5ec81c429, reversing
changes made to 50b3feaa86a10689cd7ff1c03714b901ab4091c2.
2026-09-12 17:20:48 +07:00
9e0ae3a4ce The compiler can dlopen now, and Form is declared; the expander is not written
Running a macro means compiling it and loading it into the compiler, and the
step that reads as small in NEXT.md is not: OCaml has no dlopen for ELF, and
lib/dune had no foreign_stubs. So the boundary is built first and the expander
not at all. lib/dynload_stubs.c is the whole of it — dlopen, dlsym, a
four-argument call into a macro thunk, and a peek/poke family, because OCaml
cannot address the raw memory a Form image has to be laid out in.

Nothing aggregate crosses to C. The unions lane verified a union's memory
layout against clang, which is a different claim from LLVM's convention for an
aggregate passed or returned by value in hand-written IR, so Emit.macro_thunk
wraps every macro in void(ptr,i64,ptr,ptr): the slice is built and the result
stored on the LLVM side, and the compiler's side is four pointers.

Build.macro_module links the runtime in rather than declaring it external, so
the module has no undefined symbols and the compiler's own link needs no
-rdynamic. That is the difference from Build.shared, whose host is a running
Flan program.

defunion Form and the list-building surface quasiquote will desugar into are in
the prelude. Form mirrors Form.value and not Form.t: no loc field, so the
compiler stamps the call site's location onto everything a macro returns.

The compiler builds. dune test was not run, and Form's layout is asserted
nowhere — NEXT.md's new handoff section says what the three numbers are, what
the next two commits should be, and the four decisions this made that the
design did not settle.
2026-09-12 17:18:26 +07:00
22cc0bc1c2 Names that did not exist when the process started
Editing a defvar or a defn is a symbol the host exports. Adding one is not:
there is nothing to bind to and ELF cannot grow a symbol. runtime/flan_dev.c is
the two lookups that cover it - flan_dev_cell for a new function's cell,
flan_dev_global for a new global's storage - both idempotent, so the second
module to mention a name gets what the first one got. That is the whole point:
two modules with their own copy of a new function would each call their own,
and redefining it would update one of them.

The compiler picks per name. A name the host has is a symbol and costs one load
at a call site; a name it lacks is a registry lookup cached at install time in
a module-local slot, and costs two. The common case pays nothing for the
general one.

The redefinition unit is now a list of top-level forms rather than one
function. It has to be: v3 of the fixture adds a var and uses it from a
redefined bump, and splitting that into two loads leaves a module referring to
storage that does not exist yet. C-c C-c passes one name, C-c C-k passes a
file's worth, one path either way.

Four rules, each silent if broken. Every lookup resolves before any body is
published, or a caller reaches a function whose slots are still null - asserted
on the emitted flan_reload_install, since it cannot be race-tested.
flan_dev_global refuses a size change, which is the layout-drift rule's first
enforcement point rather than another exception to it. Nothing is ever
dlclosed, because a cell holds an address inside a module's text. And the table
is fixed capacity, because a module holds a cell's address for as long as it is
loaded and a realloc would strand it.

The test that separates this from a plausible wrong version is v4, which
redefines a name v3 introduced at run time. v3's bump is already installed and
is not rebuilt, so it picks v4 up only if its call goes through a cell both
modules found by the same name. Had v3 cached the function's address instead,
every other assertion would still pass and the transcript would read 246
instead of 432.

Sizes are spelled LLVM's way, ptrtoint getelementptr null 1, rather than by a
layout calculator in OCaml that would have to agree with LLVM's on every
target.
2026-09-10 21:34:31 +07:00
6d86d09a84 Type checking and stuff 2026-09-10 17:27:53 +07:00
e9cdbb321b Lisp based flan 2026-09-10 14:40:34 +07:00
omniscient
a9fa510483 example parsing string to AST 2024-07-09 21:01:55 +10:00
omniscient
73a6f0a6bd Init project 2024-07-06 13:16:53 +10:00