Two frames offering `retry` put both on the break loop's list and only the
inner one within reach: §4's walk takes the first frame offering a name, by
definition, so the outer clause was drawn, offered, and unreachable. The old
prompt showed `retry` twice and sent the string either way. An index is the
only thing that can say which one, which is why SBCL identifies them
positionally too.
An index is worthless against a stack that moves, though, and this one moves:
the break loop is the poll loop, so every restart-case an evaluation enters
pushes and pops the same global list between the listing and the choice. So
the list is read once on entry and copied — names into the agent's own buffer,
frames as the addresses a transfer carries — and every answer comes from that.
The name still travels with the index as a receipt, checked against the
snapshot and refused if the two have drifted, so a bare integer can be wrong
out loud.
And the third state. A restart below the thunk a break is inside was accepted,
announced, and silently not taken: `flan_reload_call` holds its own transfer
channel and drops it on return, so the unwind stops at the thunk. The boundary
is now recorded where it is made, at the call — frames a restart-case inside
the thunk pushes are above it and still work — and such a restart is listed,
marked, and refused with the reason.
`break.flan` grew the shadowed pair, and 900 is a value no by-name lookup in
that file can produce.
spec-conditions.md §2, and the reason the transfer was worth building. An
unhandled error runs a hook instead of rt_die(), on the frame that erred with
nothing unwound, lists the restarts between there and the top, and waits.
A hook rather than a direct call because the loop lives in vendor/agent, which
is an optional package, and flan_rt.c is the release runtime - a program with no
agent leaves it null and dies the way it always did. The hook resumes by writing
a restart into the transfer channel, which is the channel an invoke-restart
writes and reaches the same guard, so choosing from the break loop and choosing
from a handler are one act lowered once. §6 needed no change.
The break loop is the poll loop, run from the error rather than from the frame
boundary. That is load-bearing: an expression evaluated while stopped is a
module the listener queues and the game thread runs, so a loop that did not
drain that queue would hang C-x C-e exactly when it is wanted most. Installing
while stopped is allowed, which contradicts the rule that a redefined function
must not be swapped while it is on the stack - that rule is about mid-frame
consistency and there is no frame in progress here. The old body keeps running
and a retry reaches the new one through the cell, which is the whole point.
A restart frame carries its name now, beside the hash. Matching never needs it;
showing someone their choices does, and nothing at run time can turn a hash back
into a name.
A choice is checked on the listener thread against a stack the stopped game
thread is holding still. Answering ok and finding out on the game thread that
nothing offers that name would report success for something that cannot happen.
The test errors twice and takes a different restart each time, so a loop that
always resumed the same way fails it.
