FIX.org, NEXT.md, DISCUSS.org, docs/DISCUSS.md and the session handoff at the
root are one TODO.org now: 293 entries under seven subsystem headings, each
carrying an org keyword that says where it stands. A DONE entry is a few lines
saying what was decided and what that rules out; the reasoning that would not
compress — the embedding spike and the four reports the hand-written x86
backend was built from — moved into docs/BUILT.md instead, and its entries
point there in one line.
Every entry was checked against the tree before it got a keyword, and the
prose was wrong in both directions. Things the deleted files called open were
built: the first-evaluation stall, main being redefinable, macro parameter
lists, the type-limit constants, the array constructors, the byte fills,
inc/dec, the discard's fontification, the Emacs buffers, rt_die's _exit, the
backtrace surface, and the acceptance failure that could print and still exit
zero. Things they called done were not: the backend reports' no-plan buckets
had gone stale in the other direction, the value-dependent defvar was
superseded rather than built, and macro-expansion source locations are on an
unmerged lane, so that entry is NEXT and names the branch.
Every comment that cited one of the five by name now cites a heading that
exists, in TODO.org or in docs/BUILT.md. The session reports under
docs/handoffs/ keep naming the files they worked on, because rewriting them
would falsify what those sessions did; each carries a note saying where the
content went.
spec-memory.md's case 2, capture by value into a stack environment, and
the calling convention the author's rulings asked for.
(Fn [i32] i32) captures; {code, env}; the common case
(CFn [i32] i32) the bare address; one word; cannot capture
A local of the enclosing function that an fn names is copied into a
struct the checker synthesises, held in a slot of that function's frame,
and the value carries its address; the lifted body reads the copies back
into named slots of its own, once, at entry. So the name in the body
means what the local held at the instant the value was made --
fn-capture.flan changes the local through a pointer after the value
exists and the fn still answers with the old one.
Two types rather than a uniform environment parameter: "while it's dyn
first, static side should never have to pay the price for the existence
of the dyn side... if you fully opt out, for instance, using --no-gc
flag, then we should be operating under Odin/C semantics and never paying
any runtime costs." The environment is declared by exactly the bodies an
(Fn ...) value can reach -- a lifted literal in an Fn position, every
handler clause, and the widening thunks -- and by nothing else. An
ordinary defn emits the signature it always did; calc-me and fourteen
corpus programs were diffed to say so.
CFn, because the C carries information: a value with no environment is
the only kind that could ever cross to C, and under the --no-conditions
direction FIX.org records it becomes literally a C function pointer. It
is not that today -- a declare cannot take a function type at all -- and
crossable's refusal says so where a reader would otherwise be misled.
Nobody needs CFn: Fn accepts everything, and the commonest reason to
reach for the narrow one is that a *named* function handed to an Fn pays
a hop through the widening thunk where a CFn is a direct call.
That thunk is one small function per distinct signature widened, which
reads the bare address back out of the environment and calls it. The
cheaper trick -- the environment last, ignored by a body that never
declared it -- is legal under SysV and is a trap under wasm32's
call_indirect, which compares the signature at the call. Every indirect
call is exactly typed now.
A handler clause captures the same way and is sound with nothing left
over: its frame is popped by the body that pushed it. What is refused
there is a *store* into a captured name -- it is a copy, and writing to
it would leave the local as it was.
And the other half, which is what "non-escaping" means: a value carrying
an environment may be called, passed down and let-bound, and may not be
returned, stored, pointed at or pushed into a container. A parameter of
type Fn is treated as one, which answers "passed to something that stores
it" with no interprocedural analysis -- the store is refused inside the
callee. Everything of type CFn is clean for free, which is the second
thing having two types buys. Every refusal names case 3, the environment
the collector owns.
Two pre-existing bugs fell out on the way. A lifted fn asked for Fnval,
so `flan reload' on any function containing an fn literal died at llc
with an undefined cell; it takes Flanfn now, which is the choice a
handler clause always made. And a redefinition module now carries its
own hidden copy of every thunk it names, which is the same bug shape
caught before it shipped.
The author: "I think I prefer length over len, because then I'll use len as
the variable name". One arm in check.ml, one row in the table beside it, and
every (len x) in lib, test, examples, vendor, spike, docs, web, emacs,
plan.org and NEXT.md rewritten.
Shadowing and builtin/ had already taken most of the sting out: a (defn len
...) was legal and won in its own file, and builtin/len reached past it. What
was left is that len was still a builtin — the defn earned a warning, and a
wrapper had to say builtin/ at every inner call. Now there is nothing under
the short name: len is an ordinary identifier in every position, which is
what (let [len (length xs)] ...) wants.
length takes over as shadowing's worked example rather than the feature
losing one. shadow-builtin.flan, builtin-qualified.flan, pkgs/shadowed and the
builtin/ rows in test_flan move to it and go on testing shadowing.
A call to a len nothing defines is answered where an unknown function is,
after every table and after the shadowing guard, so a program with its own len
never reaches it. The sentence is said rather than guessed at — len and length
are three edits apart and the did-you-mean's net is one — and the call is
written back out through spell_arg, as-slice's spelling lifted out of it and
now shared, so what is printed compiles.
sand.flan:33 still calls the old name and is the author's to change; until it
does, test_acceptance and test_session abort there. Both were run green
against a copy with that one line changed. FIX.org says so.
(< a b c) was an arity error. The folding operators had taken two operands
or more since fold_left_prim went in; the six comparisons had not, and they
are the ones the game hit.
The orderings and = chain: (< a b c) is a below b and b below c, because the
left fold would compare a bool against a number. != does not — the author's
ruling is that (!= 1 2 1) should be false — so it asks about every pair,
Common Lisp's /=. Whether a sequence is increasing is a question about
neighbours; whether a set of values are all different is a question about the
set, and the pair chaining never looks at is the one that decides it.
Every operand is bound to a slot first, in source order, so an operand two
pairs name is evaluated once — the spelling a reader would write, (and (< a b)
(< b c)), evaluates b twice. The conjunction then stops at the first pair that
fails, with nothing observable riding on it: everything has already run.
At two operands both readings are one pair and neither goes through the n-ary
lowering, so every comparison there is emits what it always did. (< x) joins
(+) and (- x) as a refusal — it would be true whatever it was handed.
rand-int, rand, rand-bool, rand-int-range and rand-float-range, at the widths
the author ruled: a u64 draw and an f64 in [0, 1). rand-seed and rand-state
keep their names. The four old names are not names, and each is refused by the
one that is, with a call that compiles — in both the call and the bare-name
position, because a Lisp-1 makes the second a real thing to write.
The generator's step is untouched, so a seed means what it meant. Its output
function is not: PCG-XSH-RR folded the state to 32 bits, and no honest u64 or
53-bit f64 comes out of 32 bits without a second step. PCG-RXS-M-XS 64 answers
64 from the same one, so all five still cost exactly one draw and a seeded run
is reproducible. The price, written where it lives: the permutation is a
bijection of the state, which is what 64 output bits from 64 state bits costs.
The sequence is therefore a different one, and programs/rand.flan pins it —
reproducibility across the five, the single-draw cost of each, the half-open
boundaries, and rand-bool's count over a thousand flips.
sand.flan is not touched. It calls rand-f32, so the cases that compile or
re-evaluate it skip themselves on the fixture rather than on a comment: fix
its two calls and every one of them runs again. Its hash is the old
generator's grid and gets re-taken then.
($u x) was an unknown function in the same body where (vec-new $u) was an
unbound type variable, because the cast arm did not take the sigil clause
type_named took. It takes it now, so one mistake has one story.
And the story was a rule rather than an answer: "only a defn signature can"
is what to say when nothing is in scope to name — a struct field, a global —
but inside a signature that introduces $t, the name that was meant is almost
always t. It names them. Which names those are comes from tyvars abstractly
and from subst inside an instantiation, because a body is checked under both
and reading one would answer the same mistake two ways in a single run.
