A type-changing (map f) is the case into's single shadowed element name
would break if the shadowing were a trick rather than the language's
rule; it is not, because each stage is a fresh slot at its own type, and
into.flan now runs an i32 source into a (Vec f32) to say so.
A move-only accumulator carried round by recur is the shape BUILT.md
pitches the form on and was untested. It works, and recur.flan now
carries a Vec three times round and answers with it.
block's empty-body arm returned before the loop that distributes the
tail, so (do) in a tail position left ctx.tail set for whatever was
checked next. Latent rather than live — every consumer sets it
immediately before use, and the leaking form is always Unit-typed — but
it is one line to close and the invariant is easier to state closed.
Also the PORTING.md line listing loop/recur among the things with no
customer: it was built, and the half of that finding that still stands is
tail calls, which were not.
(into xs (vec-new i32) (map double) (filter even?)). The function name is
syntax and never a value, so (map double) is (double x) written into the
loop body: no intermediate collection, no closure, no generics, nothing
to inline. Transducers would compose at run time and Rust's iterators
need monomorphisation; a macro needs neither. into.flan counts the pulls,
which is the assertion a unit test cannot make.
The destination is in the form because the destination is the allocation,
and that is what makes spec-memory.md's explicit-allocator rule true by
construction rather than by convention. Which also settles the open
question: reductions do not share the form. A seed is not an allocation,
so (into xs 0 (map cost) (sum)) would be a second form wearing the same
spelling, and the destination would stop being honest about what it is.
A source that is already a name is used as it is, not bound. A (Vec T) is
move-only, so binding it would take the caller's ownership for something
that only reads; a fixed array would be copied once per into. A source
that is anything else is still bound once, which is what a call needs.
The wart is that an owning temporary there leaks, because the binding has
a name the caller cannot reach — a call in that position should borrow,
and drop is what would close it.
All four of the prelude's macro limits bit and none blocked anything. The
three refusals are names nothing defines, which is the only error
facility a macro has. into-wrap is a defn using only special forms, so
Macro.reduce does not drop it, and it is the first thing in the prelude
written as a loop/recur.
