web/index.html had no section on the FFI's generated half at all; it has one
now, with the command, the config, and the reason committing the output is what
makes the no-header property honest rather than a caveat.
BUILT.md gets why the 172 stay, which is the part that is easy to get wrong:
136 of them are exactly what the rule produces and the rest are expressible as
overrides, so the superset argument is sound and still leads somewhere bad —
deleting them reduces the signature check to a tautology.
DISCUSS.md 6a and 6b are answered rather than left open, and 6b's own point
about enums turns out to be live in the tree: key-down? keeps its Key
parameter because it is hand-written, and the generated key-up? beside it
takes an i32.
The capability lists were written before the code held the line they claim.
Under an expression root, RET on a field of a union built `(.at s)' and sent
it, and the checker refused it — "a union's fields belong to a case ... they
are reached by (match ...)". A refusal from the far end of a socket is exactly
what this buffer's own comment says not to do: every refusal is by name, here,
with the reason, because RET working on some lines and erroring on others
teaches nothing about the language.
It is a refusal of the *parent* and not of the value at point, which is why it
is not in `flan-inspect-refusal': a struct field that merely holds a union is
an ordinary accessor and has to stay enterable. It is a field of the union
itself that cannot be written. The two cases are one test each.
The slot root steps into it by offset and is unaffected, which is the
difference the manual now claims and the tests now show.
`lib/dev.ml' cited DISCUSS.md item 1 as a hole; item 1 is the answer now, so
it cites BUILT.md instead. And the item 1 stub is two sentences and a pointer
— everything else in it is in BUILT.md verbatim, and DISCUSS.md's own header
says nothing in it is a decision.
The daemon side and the Emacs side both landed with nothing written down. Four
files owed something.
`BUILT.md` gets the whole of it: why rooting at an address alone was rejected
and why that rejection was half wrong, what a path step is and how a union's
case travels with it, why the slot goes by index and not by name, and the two
capability lists side by side — the expression root works on a running program
and cannot name a frame; the slot root names one frame and one slot and reaches
an option's payload and a union case's fields, and needs the program stopped.
Neither contains the other, which is the reason there are two.
`emacs/MANUAL.md` says the same thing in the register that file uses, under the
inspector, because the person pressing `i` is the one who needs to know which
root they got and what it cannot do. The globals section's claim that `i` works
on a global "exactly as it does on a local" was true and is now the interesting
difference, so it says what the difference is.
`NEXT.md`'s decided item is struck with what actually shipped: a frame and a
slot index rather than an address and a type, and `l` crossing between the modes
was predicted as a cost and turned out not to be one.
`DISCUSS.md` item 1 is no longer an open question. The number stays — cimport.ml
and NEXT.md cite these by number — and what stays with it is the one correction
worth keeping: an address is not an expression, but a step does not have to be
one either.
And BUILT.md's last paragraph still said `render.ml` prints `(V {:x 1.5})` and
that the printer would move when its reader did. They moved together some time
ago.
Item 12 asked five questions. All five come back clean, and the answer is
feasible with no obstacle that argues for porting the compiler.
The one that mattered most was signals, and it turned out to be a non-question:
OCaml 5.2 on Linux/amd64 installs no signal handlers at all -- fifteen swept at
four moments, every one SIG_DFL, and a plain ocamlopt executable behaves the
same, so embedding changes nothing. OCaml 5 checks the stack limit explicitly
instead of arming a guard page, so the SIGSEGV the break loop wants was never
taken. The break loop can have it outright and Stack_overflow still works. That
is measured on one platform only, and the entry says so: macOS/arm64 is the one
claim here that must be re-run rather than trusted.
The rest: -output-complete-obj links with dune uninvolved and the existing C
stubs intact, no symbol collides across the four .c files and libasmrun, the
game keeps the main thread while a C-created listener calls into OCaml after
caml_c_thread_register, and a compaction left an 8 MiB arena byte-for-byte
untouched. Startup is 0.6ms and the compiler adds 4.14MB -- which makes the
merged dev build smaller than today's daemon alone, and there is one of it
rather than two.
Written as item 14 with the numbers, the three ways the GC assumption would
break, what the spike does not cover, and the order the real work goes in. The
backend is left exactly where item 13 put it.
BUILT.md gains "The header is read now", directly under the section whose last
paragraph promised that reading a header was what would convert the trusted
half into a checked one and that it was not built. That sentence is replaced by
a pointer to the one below it, in BUILT.md and in shim.ml's docstring both.
It records the things worth not re-deriving: why the dump and not libclang (and
that Zig left libclang too, which strengthens the argument rather than weakening
it), why the import is bounded by the package's own defstructs, why generating
defstructs would make the check circular in exactly the way a _Static_assert
was rejected for, refusal-by-demotion from Zig's failDecl, the naming rule and
what it must actually guarantee, and both const-vs-non-const char * and the
target-varying widths.
The diff and the costs are stated as measurements, with the table: 16 of 16
defstructs and 172 of 172 declare-c agree against 5.5, ten real differences
against 5.1-dev, release +4ms warm, redefinition 31.0 -> 46.5ms.
DISCUSS.md item 6 is rewritten rather than removed. The mechanism question is
settled and is now in BUILT.md; what is left is narrower and is two decisions
that are the author's — whether the header stays a build-time read or becomes a
committed generator, and whether the 172 hand-written lines migrate. Both have
the argument on each side written out, including what migration would lose:
key-pressed? is a better name than is-key-pressed, and an enum parameter
imports as i32 because nothing tells the importer the package calls KeyboardKey
"Key".
