The louder failure had the quieter answer. A generated reader accumulates
errors on the cursor — which is what lets it be a straight line of
assignments — and the cursor is made and dropped inside the entry point, so a
stray brace in a file read at run time handed the program a zeroed struct and
said nothing at all. That is the one thing the rest of vendor:edn refuses to
do: read-file answers an Option precisely so a malformed document is
distinguishable from one that is literally nil, and the hand-written reader in
test/programs/edn.flan tests ok? and prints the reason. ReadFailed is the
derived reader being as honest, in both packages, and it sits beside
SchemaDrift because both are "the file is not what this program was built for".
Then the writing-down. docs/BUILT.md gets the section: the four things the
macro system did not have and now does, each general and none of them
mentioning EDN — a macro reading a file at the call site's path, a package
macro calling its package, one call answering several declarations, and
compile-error, which is the one piece that had to go in the compiler and the
reason it had to. The set rule the real game file decided is there too, and
what defjson shares, which is the design and not the code.
NEXT.md item 9 and PORTING.md §3.9 both close. Not as (read-edn T bytes): the
struct comes from the *file* rather than from a type declared by hand, so the
~80 lines PORTING prices for two schemas are not written at all. The competing
answer PORTING names — compile-time embedding — turned out to be the other half
rather than a competitor: the shape comes from the file at compile time and the
bytes may come from an embed beside it, which is exactly what
test/programs/edn-provide.flan does.
vendor:json depends on vendor:edn for nothing, and borrowing a shape walk
across that line would be a dependency for the sake of a resemblance. What
carries over is the shape of the answer — one walk giving a type, the
declarations that type needs and the expression that reads one; a refusal
carried in a field rather than raised; a typed one-line constructor per
collection; and a compile-error wrapped in a defn nothing calls.
What is genuinely different is four things. Strings go through string-of and
never through .text: .text is the raw interior with escapes undecoded, so a
field read off it would hold a backslash and an n where the file meant a
newline — which is the first two lines of the acceptance output and the reason
they are two. Commas and colons are tokens rather than whitespace. An object's
keys are strings, so a key has to be refused when it is not a name a program
could write, and refused again when it carries an escape: the generated reader
compares against the bytes as written, which costs no allocation per key and is
only the same question when the name is written plainly. And there are no sets,
so there is no map-key path and no fixed array — every collection is a (Vec T)
and defjson is the smaller of the two by half.
JSON has no integer type; the tokenizer draws the line at whether a number has
a fraction or an exponent, which is the only line there is, so 1 derives i64
and 1.0 derives f64. That is the file's own distinction and the honest one to
take.
@x86 matches on it and @sanitize is clean.
