C-u C-x C-e was never tried on a macro call. Ast.pause_call takes the
expanded loc, which Loc.from_macro has stamped -- it sets a name and
leaves file, line and column the call site's, so the frame the break
loop reports is the line the reader is looking at. Asserted rather than
argued.
Also: the ring rule stated generally (refused at the parse of whichever
file first has both members in scope, always before a session exists),
and the declaration refusal's sentence made build-neutral, since the arm
fires in an ordinary file parse too.
Parse.expr never ran the expander, so a macro call typed as a bare
expression was an unknown name -- a package's and the prelude's alike,
which is what said the gap was older than importable macros. It is the
wrap Parse.decl already had, applied to the other entry point, with
Parse.with_imported in front of it in Session.eval_expr because the one
expression an editor sends carries no import.
The decision that was waiting: an expression that expands to a
declaration is refused by name, in the head dispatch rather than in a
walk over what the expander answered, so a nested one and a hand-typed
one get the same sentence. A quasiquoted declaration is still a value.
The spin refusal fires on this path; the ring cannot reach it, because a
ring is refused while its own package is parsed. Expansion happens
before the thunk is built, so the 5s three-way wait is untouched.
Load.program takes forms: it reads the import forms, resolves them with the
one resolver it always had, and parses the file with the packages' macros in
front of it. The refusal said this needed a second import resolver at the Form
level. It did not notice that the file being compiled is parsed before Load
runs too, so no shape of the feature could have left import resolution where
it was.
Names arrive qualified, as a defn's do. (mac/twice 4) is a call and (twice 4)
is an unknown name.
Stopped mid-task: dune test was never run and the acceptance wiring is
unfinished. HANDOFF-macros.md has what is left.
The author's decision, and it removes the one syntax question generics
had. A return type can no longer be written in braces, so a {...} after
the signature is unambiguously the constraint map and there is no
structural rule to explain.
The reasons for the record: the brace's value meaning and its type
meaning do not correspond the way the bracket's do - [1 2 3] is a value
whose type is [3 i32], but {.x 1} is a value whose type is a name, and a
map value is built by map-new with no braces anywhere - and dropping it
reserves {} in type position for anonymous struct types.
Braces in a type are refused with the surviving spelling named rather
than falling through to "expected a type". Types.to_string and
Cimport's source printer both print (Map K V) now, and Shim refuses the
application spelling where it used to refuse only Ast.Tmap.
The spike proved the shape; this makes it the feature. A generic body is
still checked abstractly once, but now it may be told what to assume:
{:where (ordered? $t)} at the head of the body, Clojure's {:pre [...]}
spelling, with five predicates - ordered?, equal?, hashable?, numeric?
and copyable?.
The syntax catch settled structurally: {K V} is still a legal return
type, and a constraint map is told from one by its leading keyword. A
keyword is not a type anywhere in the language, so the slot after the
return type is unambiguous and {K V} did not have to go.
A type variable is move-only by default, with copyable? the opt-out.
Move is the stricter rule, so assuming it can only refuse a valid
program, never admit a bad one. That is Rust's T: Copy and not Odin's
anything - Odin has no move semantics at all.
The runaway refusal no longer names a depth. It names the chain: a
generic already on the instantiation stack, asked for again at a type
built around the one it had before, is growing and will not stop.
There is no TCO here and recur is not a cheaper substitute for one: the
compiler verifies the call is in the loop body's tail position, so the
mistake is a compile error where it was written rather than a stack
overflow somewhere else. A loop is a let, a While whose condition is
true, and two jumps — emit.ml is untouched, and the barrier question
recur asks is the one labelled break already answered.
Tail position is a permission that is withdrawn at the top of check, the
same read-and-withdraw defer_ok does, handed back only by a block's last
form, both arms of an if and a match arm. So nothing enumerates the forms
that are not tails, which a pre-pass over the Ast would have had to, and
would have had to keep doing.
loop is also a barrier for break and continue, which is added rather than
inherited: a loop answers with the value of its body and a jump out has
no value to give. That is also why it takes no label. A while inside a
loop keeps its own break.
Two things the shape forced. A loop binding is a plain name, because
destructuring would make recur's argument count unreadable off the
binding vector. And in_loop's "moves a value bound outside the loop"
rule had to be told about the loop's own names, or (loop [v (vec-new
i32)] ...) would have been refused for doing the ordinary thing.
Loc.Errors is a second exception, and the handlers in the session and the
daemon name only Loc.Error — so a list reaching them is an unhandled
exception and a dead session, which is the one thing the dev loop exists to
prevent. A flag on the function the session already calls left that one
label away from happening. Parse.program_all and Check.program_all are
separate names, so the session's call site has to be edited by a person for
its behaviour to change, and the guarantee stops being a default argument.
Placeless diagnostics now sort last rather than first. A wrong main signature
is raised against unknown, which is line 0, and sorting on the number alone
put it above every error that can actually be clicked. It is a real error and
it is not anywhere, so it goes after the ones that are.
A sink collects what a pass found so the pass can go on to the next thing.
It is switched on by the caller, not by the code that raises, which is what
leaves the interactive path untouched: the daemon checks one form, asks for
a sink that is off, and still gets one exception.
Two resync points, and both are places the work already had a boundary. In
the parser it is a top-level form — the reader found where each declaration
ends, so skipping a bad one cannot lose its place, while inside a
declaration there is no such landmark and one bad defn stays one error. In
the checker it is the two passes: pass one, which builds every name and
signature, still stops at the first refusal, because a signature it could
not make sense of leaves a hole that pass two would report once per mention.
Thirty unknown-name lines under one wrong signature are not thirty errors.
Pass two is where the volume is and where collecting pays, and by then every
signature is sound, so a body that fails cannot make the next body fail.
That is what makes a declaration a resync point needing no resynchronising.
Loc.Error now carries a diagnostic: a stable kind, a span, notes that each
have their own span and severity, and the macro expansion it came from. The
notes are the part that was actually missing — "this is wrong here" plus
"because of that, over there" is two places and two explanations, and a
single string can state only one of them.
The compatibility story for the daemon, which was the open question: the
single-diagnostic exception stays the single-diagnostic exception. Session
and dev evaluate one form and have one failure to report, so they take a
location and a message out of it with Loc.summary and are otherwise
unchanged. A second exception carries a list, and only a driver that
compiles a whole file raises it, so nothing interactive has to know it is
there.
No message text changed.
The slot after a defn's parameters is unconditionally a type. Parse.decl no
longer takes a set of type names, and is_type_form, qualified_type, types_in,
declared_types and prelude_types are gone with the pre-pass that fed them.
What they were for: (Option f64) and (Some 1) are the same s-expression, so the
parser decided which it had by looking the head up in a set of the file's own
type names. Sound -- one top-level namespace means a name cannot be both a type
and a value -- and brittle, because the set had to be complete. It was wrong
twice in one day, the second time parsing (defn f [] (Rune {.code 65}) (bar))
as a function returning a Rune with a one-form body, silently, in every file in
the language.
Two things fall out. A type the parser could not have known -- a struct
declared further down the file, rl/Vector2 behind an unresolved alias, a
prelude type -- never needed recognising, only placing. And a mistyped type is
a mistyped type: (defn f [] f65 0.0) reaches the resolver's near-miss check and
says did you mean f64, where it used to be read as the first form of the body
and reported as an unknown name.
Unit is written (). The old spelling is refused with a message naming the new
one, the rule the colon-to-dot change followed. Internally it is still
Tname "Unit" and Types.Unit, so the resolver, the shim and the emitter did not
change; Cimport still builds Tname "Unit" for C's void without going through
the parser. Types.to_string prints () though -- that printer prints what a
person would write for every other type it knows, [i32], {K V}, (Ptr T), and
Unit was the odd one out once the source spelling moved.
Dropping prelude_types removes one of the two reasons Macro.reduce may only
drop defns: the memoised set a bootstrap build could have poisoned is gone, so
the remaining reason is the plain one.
The mechanical half, ahead of the parser change that needs it. tools/unit-return.py
fills the empty slot with () and rewrites Unit as () wherever a type is spelled --
(Fn [i32] Unit), (Map i32 Unit), a return type written out.
Deciding whether a defn already had a return type is the whole difficulty, and
the script does it the way parse.ml did: is_type_form is transcribed rather than
improved, because being identical to the parser it replaces is what makes the
sweep meaning-preserving. It is re-runnable, so the lanes that branched before
this can have the same pass at merge:
python3 tools/unit-return.py .
python3 tools/unit-return.py --in-strings test/test_flan.ml test/test_acceptance.ml \
test/test_session.ml emacs/test-flan-dev.el emacs/test-flan-mode.el
python3 tools/unit-return.py --raw-ml lib/prelude.ml
python3 tools/unit-return.py --in-html web/index.html
-v logs every defn it saw and what it decided, which is how a sweep of 440 sites
gets reviewed at all. Embedded modes pool a file's type declarations across all
its fragments, because a snippet split across concatenation -- decls ^ "(defn f
[s [u8]] Cursor ...)" -- cannot see the names the other half declared; pooled
names count only in bare-symbol position, for the same reason the prelude's do.
A fragment that cuts off mid-form is skipped rather than guessed at. Five sites
in test_flan.ml still needed a hand, and they are in this commit.
Two things ride along because the sweep needs them: parse.ml reads a lone () as
the return type of a function with no body, which was not a shape the old
optional slot could produce; and the map refusals name () rather than Unit, since
that is now the spelling a caller wrote.
The slot after a defn's parameters is about to become mandatory, and a void
function has to have something to write there. () is ML's spelling and it
cannot collide: an empty call is not a valid expression, so () has no reading
in value position for a body form to be confused with.
Additive on its own. Internally it stays Tname "Unit" -- the resolver, the
shim and the emitter all speak that name and none of them change -- so this is
two arms in parse.ml: texpr reads () as the unit type, and is_type_form says
that a leading () is a return type rather than the first form of a body.
return is refused inside handler-bind and restart-case blanketly, and rightly:
a return always crosses the frames they pushed. A break does not. A loop
written wholly inside a restart-case body has a perfectly good local break, so
the rule is a barrier on the loop stack rather than a flag — a jump is refused
exactly when a barrier stands between it and the loop it names, and the message
says which construct. handler-bind and restart-case bodies are barriers, so is
a restart clause, so are a defer's forms; a handler clause is lifted into its
own function and needs no rule at all. in_frames is untouched: a return is the
special case where the target is always outside every barrier.
continue wanted the other blocker. check_dotimes folded its step onto the end
of the body, which a continue would jump past, so the counter would never
advance and the loop would hang. Tast.While carries a latch now — condition,
body, latch — the step goes there, and emit_while emits four blocks. A while's
latch is empty and folds away.
Labels are Odin's, in the head position: (while :outer c ...) and (break
:outer). A keyword there is unambiguous because a loop condition is never one,
so one label function serves while, until, dotimes, break and continue. It is
not a goto — the checker resolves a label against the loops the form is
lexically inside, so control can only leave a loop it is already in.
Break and Continue carry a relative depth rather than a name, because that is
what a backend already has: emit keeps one entry per While the way it keeps
one pad per frame, and indexes it.
Nothing in the prelude wants either. Every early exit there is a return from
the function, which break cannot replace; the sentinel-flag loop break exists
to remove does not appear in it. The two the compiler emits are that shape and
are the one place it cannot help — their sentinel is set inside a restart-case.
reach.ml and render.ml take the While arity change and nothing else.
[4 T] is the type syntax and is unchanged; it already works in a defvar, a
parameter, a field and a return. A let binding is the one position with no
type slot, and there the brackets are an array literal of two elements whose
second is a type name — which came back as "unknown name rl/Vector2" and cost
32 hand-written Vector2s in one raylib example.
(array COUNT TYPE) is a parser form rather than a builtin call, because the
second argument is a type and the parser's callers have none. Parse assembles
the Tarray itself, so the count takes a constant's name for free and a value
in the type position is refused by the type reader's own message. The checker
resolves it to Tast.Zero — no new backend node and no new type.
(zeroed [4 T]) was proposed first and rejected: the parser can tell, a person
cannot. zeroed keeps its job of being inferred; array is the one that is told.
plan.org milestone 5 says when, unless, until, cond and dotimes are special
forms only until macros land. This is the first one to stop being one, and
running test/programs/macro-unless.flan means the compiler built a shared
object, dlopened it into itself and called a Flan function to find out what
(unless c a b) means.
unless is the one that moved because it is the one nothing else needs: zero
uses in the prelude, so moving it cannot make the prelude depend on the
expander that compiles it. Its coverage is sand.flan, seven calls, compiled
through Session in test_session -- which is the in-process path and the reason
lib/dune now passes -linkall. Say plainly what that coverage is not: nothing
in test/programs used unless before today, so macro-unless.flan is a test
written after the feature. The corpus that was written before it is sand.flan
and web/examples/control.flan, and both compile unchanged.
lib/macro.ml is the half of expansion that has to compile something. Expand is
the image format and the quasiquote desugaring and depends on nothing above
Form; this needs Check, Build and Emit, so it sits above the parser it feeds
and arrives through Parse.expander.
What it does, in order:
- Collects every defmacro from the prelude and from the file. Not from an
imported package: Load learns a package's imports by parsing it, so
collecting from one means a second import resolver over Forms, and that is a
bigger thing than this.
- Builds them in rounds, because a macro's body may call a macro and a body
with an unexpanded call in it will not compile at all -- the call is a name
nothing defines. Round 0 takes every macro that names no macro still
waiting; round 1 expands the rest against round 0's module. A round that
takes nothing while macros remain is a ring and is named. macros.flan has
the round-1 case and macro-cycle.flan has the ring, and the distinction
between them is the one thing here that is easy to get wrong: a call inside
a quasiquote is *not* a compile-order dependency. It is part of what the
macro answers, and the answer is expanded again after it returns. The first
macro-cycle.flan written for this commit quasiquoted, and it was not a cycle
at all -- it hit the fuel instead, correctly.
- Walks bottom up, so a macro never sees a call to another macro in what it is
handed, and re-expands what comes back, so a macro that expands into a call
to itself keeps going. That loop is bounded at 200 and says which macro ran
out: macro-spin.flan.
- Skips all of it when the file names no macro, which is nearly every file.
Otherwise every build in the suite would pay a clang driver to answer a
question nobody asked. When it does build, the module is cached under the
object cache and keyed by the prelude's source plus the file's defmacros, so
a second process pays a dlopen.
lib/dune passes -linkall, which is the one line in another lane's file. The
module installs itself into Parse.expander at initialisation and nothing
references it, so without -linkall the linker drops it from every executable
that does not name the module -- bin/main.exe among them -- and a program
calling a macro fails with an unknown name. The alternative was an install
call at every entry point, including ones in files this lane must not touch.
The one thing a macro cannot do that parse.ml could is give a reason. A macro
runs inside the compiler and anything it signals aborts the compile with no
location, so a malformed (unless) answers a name nothing defines and the
report is "unknown name unless-takes-a-test-and-a-body" at the call site --
right place, wrong sentence. NEXT.md says so.
test_flan.ml's "unless -> if(not)" assertion is gone, because it asserted a
desugaring in a file that no longer does one. Nothing else in the suite
changed.
Two things that look like plumbing and are the frontend half of expansion.
A quasiquote becomes calls to the prelude's three form-building functions and
nothing else: form-nil, form-cons for an item, form-append for a splice. It is
pure, it needs nothing loaded, and it runs over every form on the way into
Parse.program and Parse.decl, which is what lets the prelude's own macros parse
in a process that has not built a macro module yet.
Running it *before* the expander's walk is not an ordering preference. A cond
macro's body contains a quasiquoted (cond ...) for its own tail; with the
quasiquote still standing, the walk would see that head and expand it then and
there, against the wrong arguments. Desugared first, that subform is a
(Form.Sym {.s "cond"}) and there is no head left to mistake. So the walk needs
no idea that quoting exists, which is the whole reason this runs first.
Nesting levels are not counted -- not by the reader, which was written that way
deliberately, and not here. A quasiquote inside a quasiquote is refused by
name. Only a macro that writes a macro wants one, nothing in the corpus does,
and CL's level arithmetic costs more than the use case is worth so far.
A defmacro is now an Ast.Defn: (defmacro m [args] body) is
(defn m [args [Form]] Form body). There is no Ast.Defmacro and there is not
going to be one -- a macro is [Form] -> Form, compiled by the same backend as
everything else, and the only thing that makes it a macro is that the expander
calls it at compile time. One parameter, the slice of forms at the call site,
so variadics come free in a language with no &rest; two parameters is a
misunderstanding rather than an arity error and says so.
Parse.expander is the hook the walk arrives through, because expanding a macro
means compiling and dlopening it, so the expander sits above Check and Build
and Parse sits below them. Nothing fills it in yet.
The quasiquote refusal stays as a backstop: it now means a form reached the
parser without coming through program or decl. gensym's refusal is gone -- it
is an ordinary prelude function returning a Form, and a macro body calls it
like any other.
The last commit put the prelude's types into the set the parser uses to tell a
return type from the first form of a body, and put them in plainly. That set is
read by two arms: a bare symbol, and a list head. The list-head arm is why
(defn f [] (Some 1) (bar)) does not lose its body, and the comment above it has
warned about this since it was written -- so adding Rune plainly made
(defn f [] (Rune {.code 65}) (bar)) a function returning a Rune with a
one-form body, silently, in every file in the language. Confirmed before
fixing: it failed with "a map type is {K V}", which is the misparse arriving a
step later wearing someone else's error.
The enums already solve this one comment up, under their own key, for the same
reason. The prelude's types go in the same way. No prelude type takes
arguments, so a bare symbol is the only type position any of them can occupy.
Both halves are pinned in test_flan.ml's return-type section: Form is a return
type, and a prelude struct literal opening a body is not.
The boundary was verified by compilation and had never executed. Now it does:
three Flan functions compiled into a .so, dlopened into the test process, and
called with Forms this side laid out in raw memory.
lib/expand.ml is the image format and nothing else yet. A Form is 24 bytes,
align 8, payload at offset 8, and every case holds one member at the payload's
start -- a string and a slice are both { ptr, i64 }, so there is no third
offset anywhere in it. The tag is the case's position in the prelude's
defunion, which is why that list says it is a layout contract; a tag this file
and the prelude disagree about is named rather than read as some other case.
The case sends one Form of every one of the nine shapes through an identity
macro, so a tag nobody thought about is a failure and not a gap. Then two
arguments through a macro that reads the second, because a slice whose length
did not cross reads past its arguments and an identity macro would not notice.
Then a Form the *macro* allocated, through the prelude's form-cons, on the
loaded module's own heap: that is the direction nothing had ever tested, and
it is the one the expander spends all its time in.
Checked by breaking the last expectation before restoring it.
A parser bug this turned up, and it is the reason the previous lane's Form
work could not have been finished as written: is_type_form decides whether a
leading form is a return type or the first form of the body by asking whether
its name is a declared type, and the set it asks was collected from the file's
own declarations only. Check.program prepends the prelude to every program, so
the prelude's types are every file's types -- but nothing told the parser that.
It never mattered while the prelude's structs were only taken as parameters.
A macro is (defn m [args [Form]] Form ...), and bare Form in return position
was parsed as a body expression and reported as an unknown name, while [[Form]]
worked, because a Vec in that position is a type whatever is inside it. The
prelude's types are now part of the base set, read once.
The delimiter is what disambiguates: (.x v) is a call and therefore an
access, {.x 1.0} is a brace form and therefore a construction. The colon
kept two jobs -- field label and enum member -- and this leaves it with
one, keys, which is what a map literal will want.
The old spelling is refused rather than quietly accepted, and the refusal
names the new one. Two accepted spellings is how two spellings become
permanent, and this repo rejects what it does not support and says why.
:keys keeps its colon. It names no field -- it is an instruction to the
compiler that happens to sit in the same brace -- so leaving it alone is
what lets the dot mean exactly one thing.
render.ml prints the dot too, or a struct the daemon shows would not be
Flan anyone could paste back.
spec-memory.md defines an allocator as a procedure plus an opaque data
pointer, which reads as a function value, which check.ml refuses four ways.
None of the four is anywhere near this: `Allocator` is a `Types.t` case with
no user-writable constructor, the way `string` is a builtin ptr+len, its
procedure is a C symbol the emitter names, and every operation is an ordinary
named call that `check_call` already routes through `named_call`. The one
thing that really does need milestone 5 is a *user-written* allocator — it
wants a defn's name in value position — and that is refused by name with that
reason rather than left to come back as an unknown function.
An `Allocator` value is a pointer to the runtime's struct and never a copy of
one. That is forced, not chosen: the capability set has to be readable from
wherever a container landed, and `free-all` bumps an epoch every container
made from the allocator has to observe. A copy would give each its own epoch
and the dev trap would never fire.
Two decisions the spec left to be made here, both announced in BUILT.md:
`free-all` is retain-capacity — offset = 0, the pages stay — and handing the
pages back is `arena-destroy`, a separate operation. Zig's reset takes a mode;
Odin's arena_free_all is already retain-capacity in effect. Taking the mode
would have grown the operation table the spec froze at four. The epoch is
bumped either way, because the pages being the same does not make a container
made before the reset valid.
`context/allocator` and `context/temp` are dynamic variables with save and
restore, not extra parameters. The spec calls the allocator part of the
calling convention; the literal reading touches every signature, the FFI shim,
the dev trampolines and the reload ABI for the same observable behaviour.
`with-allocator` is its own IR node rather than a let and two calls, because
the restore has to happen on the transfer path too. A body that errors leaves
through the landing pad, and a context allocator left pointing into a region
nobody outside the body has heard of would be wrong in the break loop, which
is exactly where something is about to allocate to render a condition. The
acceptance program asserts that path by taking a restart out of a body.
The backend grew one prim, `Rt of string`: a call into the runtime's C named
by symbol, with argument and result types read off the expression nodes. The
container runtime is type-erased and therefore *is* a list of C entry points,
so one arm covers all of them rather than one arm each.
spec-conditions.md §3's remaining half: a clause binds parameters, an
invoke-restart supplies them, and what a restart takes is compared at run
time because a restart is found by name on a dynamic stack — neither end
of the transfer can see the other.
The parameters live in a buffer the restart-case owns, not the invoker's
frame. A clause runs after every frame between the two has returned (§5),
so anything on the invoking side is gone by then; the invoker stores into
the target frame while both are still alive, which is the one moment they
are.
The frame carries the parameter count and a hash of how the types are
spelled, and every frame carries them whether it takes parameters or not:
a clause taking none has to refuse arguments as loudly as one taking two
of the wrong type. The count is not redundant with the hash — it is what
makes a 32-bit collision between two different signatures harmless — and
the spelling itself rides along so that a mismatch can say what was
wanted and what was given, which neither end alone knows.
The arguments are evaluated into slots before the invoke node rather than
hanging off it. An argument that transfers on its own is then guarded
before anything aims the channel, and a call written in an argument is on
the ordinary walk Reach and Load already do — a node they treat as a leaf
would have dropped the function and failed to link.
The other way a transfer starts is the break loop, which chooses by
position and has nothing to fill parameters in with. It reaches a clause
through the same channel, so nothing downstream could tell the two apart:
the frame is pushed with the buffer marked unfilled and a clause with
parameters checks that mark before reading it. Refused with the reason
rather than run on values no one supplied.
runtime/flan_rt.c gains two message functions and nothing else; the
restart frame's first four fields, which are the ones C declares, do not
move.
They came back as "unknown function break", which reads as a typo rather than
as a missing feature. plan.org's loop story is settled as imperative while/for
with break, continue and return, so these are named, planned and absent - and
they alter control flow, which is the first thing the house rule says must be
recognised explicitly rather than left to fall through to a call.
Found by the lane writing the documentation site, which had to describe the
loop forms and discovered two of them were neither implemented nor refused.
The parser decides "return type or first body form?" from the set of type
names the file declares, and an import is resolved after parsing - so a
package's structs cannot be in that set by construction. (defn mk [] rl/Vector2
...) therefore read the return type as the body and failed with "unknown name
rl/Vector2", which names the symptom and not the cause.
The signal is the alias plus the capital, and both halves are needed. An alias
is syntactically obvious and the same pre-pass collects it. A bare capitalised
symbol is never a value in this language - a struct or union constructor is
(Name {...}), a List, and an enum member is a keyword - so the hazard the
surrounding comment warns about, a body form eaten as a return type, has no
form of this shape to eat. A lowercase qualified name stays an expression,
which is what rl/get-color has to be.
Found by the raylib lane, which hit it on rl/Vector2 and reported it rather
than reaching into a file it did not own.
Two ways to write a match over an enum and two different refusals, neither
of them true. (match k :lo ...) died in the parser with "expected a pattern,
found :hi" — which arm it named depended on cons evaluation order, and it
never mentioned enums. (match k lo ...) died in the checker blaming milestone
2, which is not what stands in the way.
What stands in the way is worth writing down, because the feature is close.
An enum is an i32 at run time and its members are all known, so the arms are
a chain of (= k :member) and the exhaustiveness check falls out of env.enums
— a desugaring, no new IR node, the same shape as everything else this lane
landed. What is missing is a case in Ast.pattern for a keyword, and load.ml
matches that type exhaustively with no wildcard, so the variant cannot be
added from a session that does not own the file. One line, for whoever does.
That is also why destructuring went through a call to an unspellable name
instead: a name in call position is an open namespace check.ml already owns,
whereas tagging Pctor with ":lo" would put a second meaning into a field
another file destructures as a constructor.
The struct-tail case in the acceptance program is unrelated housekeeping: the
corpus slices arrays of i32, u8 and f32 and nothing wider, so nothing else
proves the desugared (slice xs n (len xs)) gets a struct's stride right.
plan.org says Flan is Clojure's brackets and a small slice of its API, and
(let [{:keys [x y]} p] ...) is one of the most-used parts of that surface.
A struct is Flan's map, so {:keys [x y]} and {inner :field} read fields off
one; [a b] and [a b & rest] read a fixed array.
It desugars in parse.ml into the Let bindings and Field accesses that already
exist — the same trade dotimes makes. Ast.binding carries a name and nothing
else, so nothing downstream learns that a pattern exists: not Load's renaming,
not Check, not a backend. That is not only taste. Load matches Ast.pattern
exhaustively and Shim builds Ast.binding literally, and neither file is
editable from here, so an AST variant was never on the table.
The value goes into a temporary first. A pattern over a call must call it
once, and (let [{:keys [p]} p] ...) must read the old p rather than the one
it is halfway through rebinding. The temporaries are named with a ~, which
the reader treats as a delimiter, so no source symbol can collide with one.
The arity is the one thing the parser cannot settle — it is a type — so the
pattern's shape travels to check.ml as destructure~nth, which knows how many
elements the value has and lowers to an ordinary at.
vendor/raylib has no C in it any more: shim.c is deleted and its 84 wrappers
are emitted from declare-c, which names the library's function in the library's
own signature. The reason the shim exists is unchanged - a small struct's
calling convention is a per-target classification and clang reproduces it for
free - but writing it by hand has stopped.
declare-c is a second form rather than a change to declare, because the two make
opposite claims about the same shape: (declare start-raw [path string] ...) says
the symbol takes ptr+len, and (declare-c init-window [... title string] ...)
says it takes a NUL-terminated char*. No structural rule separates them, so the
author says which.
The merge needed two fixes that neither lane could have found alone.
Load's uses-walker matches decl_kind exhaustively and did not know DeclareC, so
the reachability work and the generator did not compile together.
And the generated C is now emitted in parts keyed by the wrapper's own C symbol,
not as one translation unit. Reach.link drops the bindings nothing reachable
calls; a single TU holding every wrapper referenced every raylib symbol, so
sand-headless - which deliberately links no libraylib, and is the reason Reach
exists - failed at the link with undefined references to GetTime and its
neighbours. The first attempt keyed the parts by Flan name and broke the other
way, dropping a wrapper that was called: the flattened declaration is named
foo-c when a Flan wrapper is generated over it and foo when none is needed, so
the Flan name is not one thing. The wrapper's C symbol is what the declaration
binds in both branches.
Worth recording how close that came to passing: the acceptance suite died with
an exception rather than printing FAIL, so a grep for failures counted zero and
the suite looked green. Only the count of reporting suites - ten where there had
been eleven - showed it.
84 hand-written C wrappers is the shape of a job the compiler should be
doing. The reason the shim exists is unchanged and is not negotiable: a
small aggregate's calling convention is a per-target classification, not
part of its layout, and reproducing x86-64, arm64 and wasm32 inside
emit.ml is three classifiers to keep correct forever, where a mistake
reads as a field full of garbage rather than as a link error. clang does
it, per target, for free. So the C stays; the typing of it stops.
declare-c names the library's own function in the library's own
signature, and Shim emits the typedefs, the extern prototype, the
flattening wrapper and the flattened declaration the Flan side calls.
It is a second form rather than a change to declare because no
structural rule can separate them: (declare start-raw [path string] i32
"flan_agent_start") means the symbol takes ptr+len, and (declare-c
init-window [w i32 h i32 title string] "InitWindow") means it takes a
NUL-terminated char *. Same shape, opposite claims. declare is
untouched, so sqrtf and vendor/agent keep working unedited.
The generated C rides on Tast.program rather than beside it, so the CLI,
the REPL and the acceptance table all carry it without being told about
it. `flan shim` prints it, because a wrong binding is wrong in a wrapper
that is otherwise on no disk anywhere.
(defmacro m [x] x) answered "unknown top-level form (defmacro ...)" —
refused, but not by name and with no reason, because the refusal list
only covered expressions. Now it checks the shape and then refuses,
which are two different mistakes and get two different reasons: a
defmacro with no body is a typo, a defmacro with a body is a feature
that is not here.
The reader's new sigils made this urgent rather than tidy. quasiquote,
unquote and unquote-splicing are now real heads arriving at the parser,
and without a case each they would fall through to Call and come back
from the checker as "unknown name quasiquote" — which tells you nothing
about what is missing. unquote and unquote-splicing are refused as
mistakes rather than as milestones: they mean nothing outside a
quasiquote and the reader cannot notice, because it does not track
where it is.
gensym is neither a reader token nor a special form — it is a function a
macro body calls while the macro runs, and there is nowhere for it to
run. Refused by name so it does not arrive as an unknown one.
spec-memory.md drops (set (get m k) v) from the assignable forms: a map has an
upsert of its own, put, which either inserts or replaces, so there is no store
into a lookup - and an absent entry has no location to store into anyway.
The compiler still parsed it into an Ast.Pkey and refused it downstream as
unimplemented, milestone 6, which is the wrong reason for something that is
never arriving. The place form is gone from ast, tast, load, check and emit,
and the parser refuses the shape where it is written, with the reason and a
pointer to put.
spec-conditions.md §2. The same lookup as signal, and the difference is
entirely what happens when the walk ends: signal returns Unit and the
signalling function carries on, error has type Never and the program stops.
Only a transfer gets past it, so emit puts a guard after the call and then
unreachable - and flan_error cannot be marked noreturn for the same reason, it
does return, on exactly one path.
Being Never is what lets it stand where a value was expected, which is the
fall-through shape §1's load-texture example needs and the reason it is worth
having before the break loop rather than after. An unhandled one names the
condition on stderr and dies the way every other trap does; flan_error is where
the dev-build break loop will go.
The two spellings share one AST and IR node with a kind beside them, the same
shape Ast.unwrap already uses for some and try, because they differ in one
decision and nothing else. test/programs/error.flan is the unhandled case,
asserted on the exit code and the reason rather than through the outputs table,
which only has room for a program that exits 0.
error, find-restart and compute-restarts are named in spec-conditions.md and had
no case in parse.ml, so each fell through to Call and came back as unknown name
- the very shape the house rule exists to prevent, and the one that makes a
missing feature look like a typo.
Three message strings from the previous commit had their line continuations
collapsed into runs of spaces. Rewrapped; no change to what they say.
spec-conditions.md §3 to §6. A handler runs where the signal was, decides, and
control resumes at a restart-case further out - so unlike step 1 this one does
alter control flow, and it is lowered explicitly rather than through platform
unwinding, because wasm32 cannot unwind and because a cmp/jne after a call
reads like ordinary code.
The channel is the out-parameter §6 settled on: one ptr appended to every Flan
signature, written by an invoke-restart and checked after every call. The
return type stays what the source says, one pointer threads down the whole
chain, and a frame that sees the channel set just returns early - which reuses
the existing return path and with it §5's defers for free. Emit.signature was
already the one place a signature is spelled, which is what made that part
small.
Every function is transfer-transparent, release included. §6's escape analysis
is an optimisation; in a dev build a cell can hold anything, so the honest
answer to what a call can reach is anything, and uniform means redefinition
acquires no new refusal class.
The transfer target is the restart frame's own address and not a static clause
id, which corrects what the handoff note had settled. An id has to be unique
against every module a running program may later load, and a hash is only
probably unique - two restart-cases colliding means the inner one silently
catches a transfer aimed at the outer. The frame is an alloca in the function
that offers it, so the address is exact and it also says which clause, which is
how clause ids disappeared. Re-entering a restart-case then needs nothing
extra, since each activation allocates its own frames.
Cleanup is landing blocks, one per region rather than one per function: a
restart-case's pops its frames and either dispatches or forwards, a
handler-bind's pops the handler frames on the way past, and the function's own
runs its defers and returns. One function-wide block would have jumped straight
past the very restart-case that was meant to catch the transfer. The channel is
cleared before any cleanup runs and put back after, or a defer's first call
would branch straight back into the block it came from.
flan_signal takes the channel and passes it to each handler, stopping once one
writes to it. That makes the one C frame every handler is reached through
transparent to a transfer, which it has to be; it is also the only one, since
extern is Flan-to-C only and there are no function values yet.
Refused by name with the reason, each with a test on the reason: restarts with
parameters, return inside a restart-case body, one restart-case offering a name
twice, and invoke-restart inside a defer - a defer is the cleanup a transfer
already runs, so starting one there leaves the defers half run with two targets
and no way to choose. The lexical case is the checker's and the one that
reaches a function through a call is trapped at run time. No restart of that
name is a located runtime error at the invoke site, because there is nowhere to
resume.
Two things found on the way. `{ ctx with in_handler = true }` was a latent bug:
ctx.slots is mutable, so a copy allocated the body's slots into a record the
function never saw again - harmless only because no handler-bind body in the
tests had a let in it. And test/reload_host.c calls flan.outer through an asm
label, which does not fail at link time when the prototype is a parameter
short; it reads garbage as the channel and dies somewhere else.
test/programs/restarts.flan runs at -O2, at -O0 and as a dev build. -O0 is not
redundant: the guard after every call is control flow the optimiser would
otherwise launder, and the dev build is where each of those calls goes through
a cell.
spec-conditions.md §1 and §2 and nothing else, because those two are worth
having alone: signal returns Unit whatever it finds, a handler that returns
normally leaves the signalling function to carry on, and with nothing matching
it is a no-op. So none of §6's transfer machinery exists yet and no signature
changed - which is the whole reason to do this step first.
The runtime is a linked list. Establishing a handler is two stores and a push
onto a frame on the establishing function's own stack, and signal with an empty
stack is a null check, which is what §2 asks for. Popping is by frame rather
than by count, so restoring what this one displaced is right even if something
below it left the stack out of step.
A condition's type is a hash of its name and not an index: an index would shift
the moment a struct were added, and every handler a running program had already
pushed would match the wrong type. The condition crosses as a pointer, since a
handler runs while the signalling frame is alive and there is nothing to copy -
but what the clause binds is the condition itself, the pointer being a hidden
parameter and the name a slot loaded from it, so a handler passing c to
something expecting the struct is not handed an address.
A clause is lifted into a function of its own, because a handler runs from
wherever the signal was and cannot be a branch in the function that wrote it.
That gives two refusals, both by the house rule. A handler cannot see the
establishing function's locals - that is a closure with an explicit
environment, so a reference to one is refused for that reason rather than
reported as an unknown name. And return inside a handler-bind body is refused,
since the frames are popped on the way out and an early exit would leave them
pointing into a function that has gone.
Settled in advance for the next step: in a dev build every function is
transfer-transparent, because a cell can hold anything and the honest answer to
what it can call is anything. Same bargain as the indirect call, and it means
redefinition acquires no new refusal class. Still open is whether the
discriminated result is returned by value or through an out-parameter.
Second stage of the milestone-2 frontend. calc-me.flan (12 decls) and
sand.flan (20 decls) both parse end to end, and both are test deps so a
regression fails `dune test` rather than surfacing at the CLI.
Three silent-misparse bugs fixed along the way -- all cases that read
cleanly and meant something else:
- dotimes/defer/some/try/fn fell through to Call, discarding their
binding and control-flow meaning. Now special forms. Forms from later
milestones (handler-bind, restart-case, loop/recur, defmacro, signal,
with-allocator, errdefer, await) are rejected outright rather than
parsed as calls.
- (Some 1) in first body position was read as a return type, because
(Option f64) and (Some 1) are identical s-expressions and the
heuristic was capitalisation. Now decided by the set of names actually
declared as types, collected in a pre-pass -- exact, and
order-independent so a type declared below its user still resolves.
- Array literals in value position were rejected outright.
Also adds NEXT.md with the handoff for the checker.
