2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
a4c6b996ff def re-runs its initialiser, and defvar is renamed defonce
The trio the author decided on 2026-09-20 is now all built: def is CL's
defparameter — its initialiser runs on every daemon re-run, unguarded, so
an edited initialiser repaints the same storage on C-c C-c plus re-run —
defonce (Clojure's name for CL's defvar, per the author) initialises once
behind the .init~once. flag, and defconst stays the image.

One parse arm reads both forms; the difference is Ast.reinit, carried to
Tast.global's grerun. Emit.startup_plan gives a def no guard flag, and
Check.check_global lifts every def initialiser — zero and literal
included — into global/<n>, so the host's startup reaches it through the
function cell and a re-evaluated def swaps it (Session's def_inits;
Emit.redefinition declares the cell for a non-sibling target). The old
defvar spelling is refused with the rename and both compiling spellings,
and every program, test, doc and editor list is swept — except sand.flan,
the author's live WIP, whose seven defvar lines are flagged in FIX.org
and keep its three dependent tests red on this branch.
2026-09-21 07:12:04 +07:00
fef6ae04f6 A failed build is a refusal, and a refusal leaves the session standing
The daemon caught Loc.Error at each op and nothing else. That was survivable
while the frontend was the only thing that could refuse a form; it is not now
that expansion is part of evaluating. Both C-c C-c and C-x C-e run a clang
driver through Build.macro_module, which answers with an exit status and a
Failure, and a dlopen that finds no symbol answers with another one. Neither
is a Loc.Error, so neither was answered, and an exception past serve is not a
refused evaluation — it is a dead daemon with the program still on screen and
a closed socket waiting for the editor's next request.

The boundary is now one place, around the whole of a request, rather than a
new arm at each of the dozens of calls. Out_of_memory, Stack_overflow and
Sys.Break go through it: those say the process cannot continue, and answering
"error" to them would claim a session survived something it did not.
Everything else is about the form that was sent, and the message it carries
is the one the user can act on, so a clang exit status reaches :message
instead of being flattened to "internal error".

The session's own state goes with it. Session.eval wrote the imported macro
set above the checker, so a form that did not check left the session holding
a package's macros and none of its declarations; it is held and committed at
the bottom with decls, program and env. Session.eval_expr committed the
generic copies it had instantiated before emitting the module that carries
them, which is the session believing it holds a body nothing was written for;
that assignment moved below Emit.

Both are pinned. test_session drives the two rollbacks in process, and
test_dev drives a real daemon whose macro module cannot be built — the
expression path and the redefinition path, each followed by the same
evaluation succeeding and by the session still knowing the program.
2026-09-13 19:43:18 +07:00