(i32 (at xs i)) inside a body bounded integer? was refused with "i32
converts a number, found t". Arithmetic, comparison, min/max, the
bitwise fold and the shifts all ask the where clause; the conversions
were the family nobody had gone back to, and the cast block held three
arms of it.
The machine-type target asked Types.is_numeric of its operand and the
enum target asked Types.Int _, so a variable fell through both to the
refusal however it was bounded. The variable target had the opposite
defect: it asked the bound of the target and then took any generic
operand, so a second variable declared only ordered? passed the abstract
pass on the strength of a sentence about a different one. Nothing wrong
was ever emitted through it — ordered? admits numbers and enums and both
convert at the instantiation — which is exactly why it is worth closing:
the hole opens the day ordered? admits a type that does not.
The rule is the repo's own, applied to a set instead of a type: a
conversion is legal at a bounded variable exactly when it is legal at
every type the bound admits. A machine-type target needs numeric?, an
enum target needs integer? because numeric? admits the floats the
concrete arm refuses, and ordered?/equal?/hashable? admit nothing — the
last by what the predicate says rather than by the set it denotes, since
hashable? already admits strings and ordered? may.
Both float targets and the narrowing i32 stay legal: (f64 i64-x) rounds
above 2^53 and (i32 f64-x) truncates where the types are written, and a
generic that refused what its copies accept would be the fork the rule
forbids. FIX.org, 2026-09-21, has the account, and records what this
costs: no predicate now licenses a generic enum to integer conversion,
and enum? is the eventual answer.
The refusal says what the variable is known to be and what to write, in
the clause spelling unconstrained already uses: a body with no clause
gets the clause, a body that has one is told which predicate to add.
The trio the author decided on 2026-09-20 is now all built: def is CL's
defparameter — its initialiser runs on every daemon re-run, unguarded, so
an edited initialiser repaints the same storage on C-c C-c plus re-run —
defonce (Clojure's name for CL's defvar, per the author) initialises once
behind the .init~once. flag, and defconst stays the image.
One parse arm reads both forms; the difference is Ast.reinit, carried to
Tast.global's grerun. Emit.startup_plan gives a def no guard flag, and
Check.check_global lifts every def initialiser — zero and literal
included — into global/<n>, so the host's startup reaches it through the
function cell and a re-evaluated def swaps it (Session's def_inits;
Emit.redefinition declares the cell for a non-sibling target). The old
defvar spelling is refused with the rename and both compiling spellings,
and every program, test, doc and editor list is swept — except sand.flan,
the author's live WIP, whose seven defvar lines are flagged in FIX.org
and keep its three dependent tests red on this branch.
A narrower scalar at a $t a slice already fixed widens into the fixed
type — the same cast a monomorphic parameter applies — where the old
rule refused both directions. One accepts pin, one runtime line in
int-generic.flan, and the web page's predicate table catches up: five
predicates, integer? at the head, and the entailment chain grown one
link.
The fifth predicate: integer? admits every integer kind and no float,
entails numeric? (and through it ordered? and equal?), and gates what
only integers support — the bitwise fold asks for it, the shifts admit
a bounded variable under it, and the float literal in an integer? body
is refused in the bound's own words. The literal arm needed nothing:
the entailment admits an integer constant under either bound.
abs-i32 and abs-i64 collapse into one integer?-bounded generic whose
i32/i64 copies even keep the old symbols; abs-f32/abs-f64 stay as the
float spellings because the right float abs is a sign-bit clear no
integer body spells, and (abs 1.5) now refuses naming the bound — the
where clause is checked before the name-collision check, which used to
answer that call with 'abs-f64 is already defined'.
Mixed widths at one $t join at the wider type now, in either argument
order — the author reversed the refuse-both rule on 2026-09-20. A
joinless pair is deferred and re-asked against the final binding, so a
later wider argument settles u32-vs-i32; u64-vs-i64 still refuses, and
a container-bound variable still binds exactly. The out-widened
arguments catch up through the ordinary Cast.
Two review follow-ups folded in: a struct field's unknown-lowercase
message stops suggesting a parameter vector it does not have, and the
tyvar-at-dyn message says defgeneric/defmethod in words instead of a
schematic that does not compile.
