print-str, print-i64, print-f64, print-bytes, print-line and newline leave
the prelude. print and println are the whole printing surface now, and print
is the better call at every one of the sites that used them: it is the same
structural walk without the newline, so the no-newline case the family was
kept for is covered, and it takes the value as it is. The old print-i64
forced an explicit (i64 x) at every call site, because this language widens
nothing implicitly; that cast is gone from 127 places.
Dropping it moves one answer. hash-grid returns u64, and the cast through
the signed printer showed sand-headless's hash as -2851001042534928384.
print routes a u64 through flan_u64_to_bytes, so it now prints
15595743031174623232 — the same 64 bits, read as the unsigned number they
are. The pinned expectation follows the correction.
test-flan-dev.el and test_session.ml both reached for print-line as "a name
the prelude has"; they reach for rand-seed instead.
nth and at were documented as the same operation, and as reads they were:
check.ml matched "at" | "nth" in one arm. But a place is recovered in two
other spots -- parse.ml for (set ...) and place_of_expr for (addr ...) --
and both match only Sym "at". So (set (nth a i) x) and (addr (nth a i))
were refused while the at forms worked.
Two names said to be identical that disagree about writing is worse than
one name, and the asymmetry is not worth fixing in three places to keep a
synonym. at is the indexing operation; nth is gone.
The six call sites were all reads, so they rewrite directly. get/put stay
the Map pair: get returns (Option V) and is deliberately not a place.
nth-gone.flan pins the removal -- it has to fail as a name nobody defined,
not quietly resolve to at again.
destructure~nth is compiler-generated and unrelated.
Finishing the text family the previous lane started. All three are over [u8]
and none of them allocates, which is what decides their shapes.
trim answers a slice of its input. That is the only shape available without an
allocator, and it is also the better one: there is no new storage, only a
narrower view of the caller's, so the result dies with its owner and trimming
modifies nothing. Both loops test (< lo hi), because an all-whitespace input
otherwise walks lo past hi and (slice s lo hi) traps on a reversed range - the
same trap the bounds table already asserts on. That input is in the case list.
index-of-bytes is naive and stays naive. Boyer-Moore wants a skip table sized
by the needle, which is an array, which is an allocation. The empty needle
answers Some 0 so that index-of-bytes and starts-with? agree on every needle,
and the length test returns before the loop so a needle longer than the
haystack cannot build a window off the end.
parse-f64 splits the work where the two halves actually differ: the grammar is
Flan's and the rounding is libc's. parse-i64 is entirely Flan because strtoll's
answers are wrong for a caller - 0 for "", 0 for "abc", 12 for "12x" - and not
because decimal-to-binary conversion is suspect. Reimplementing correctly
rounded conversion is a different and much larger problem than rejecting junk,
and IEEE-754 already guarantees strtod gives the same bits everywhere. So this
validates the whole slice and only a slice that is entirely a number reaches
bytes->f64. Every refusal in the table - "", "abc", "1x", ".", "1e", " 1",
"1 ", "0x10", "nan" - is a plausible number out of strtod.
Two caveats, both written into the source rather than discovered later. The
locale worry that keeps parse-i64 in Flan does apply to strtod's decimal point,
and is moot only because nothing in the runtime calls setlocale; if that stops
being true this is what breaks. And the length is capped at 511 because
flan_bytes_to_f64 truncates there - a validator that approved 600 digits would
be approving a different number than the one strtod reads.
digit? and space? exist because parse-f64 and trim need them, and calc-me loses
its own byte-identical digit?. One top-level namespace makes the second
definition an error rather than a shadow, which is the rule doing its job: two
copies that later drift apart is exactly what it prevents.
