Decimal is what the value is and stays first; hex and binary go beside it. It
is the wrong base for about half the numbers anyone opens this buffer for — a
colour is 0x303030FF, a gesture is an OR of flags, a mask is read a bit at a
time — and reading those out of a decimal is arithmetic done by hand.
In two places: under the header of a value opened on its own, and on each
numeric row of a field list. The second is the one that matters, because a leaf
cannot be stepped into, so the field list is the only place most numbers are
ever seen.
Nothing is asked of the program. It is arithmetic on text the renderer already
wrote, so it works on a stopped program and costs no round trip. Binary is
grouped in nibbles because a mask is read in nibbles. A negative is shown as
the 64-bit two's complement it is in memory and says the width out loud: the
rendered value carries none, and every Flan integer comes back through i64.
A float is left alone rather than answered wrongly — its bits are an IEEE
layout, reinterpreting them is a different question, and the rendered text does
not carry the width to answer it.
The pointer half of this is not done and the refusal now says why. Render.render
writes the bare word <ptr> for every pointer on purpose: it is the same renderer
print uses, an address is not stable across runs, and test_acceptance pins the
current text for that reason. Showing one is a decision about the language's
printer, not about this buffer.
Saying "the fields are not available" was under-claiming. A condition is a
struct, and Tast.structs holds every struct's field names and types in the
daemon, which owns the build — no running program is involved in answering
what a Missing is made of. Only the values need the pointer the break loop
was handed, and break_loop currently discards that pointer, so they are two
different gaps with two different fixes on two different sides of the socket.
The buffer now draws a field named and typed with its value refused, which is
what tells you whether the field you were about to blame is even a field of
this condition.
Navigation backwards was not the same list walked the other way. Forward
wrapped and backward stopped, and from the middle of a line the two disagreed
about where a field begins — a field line carries the property on all of it,
so a property-change walk from mid-line finds the end of the field you are
already in. Both now go through one list of field starts. The mid-line case
went red on the first try and the expectation was the thing that was wrong:
landing on the current field's start is what CIDER does and is the less
surprising of the two.
C-x C-e renders once and stops at depth 4 and span 8. A field past either
comes back as "..." and nothing recovers it from the echo area. Re-rooting
the walk at that field renders it from depth 0, so the bound moves with you
— that, and not tidiness, is why an inspector is worth having beside the
expression evaluator.
CIDER keeps its inspector stack on the server because a JVM value can be
retained. Nothing here can: a Flan value has no header and the thunk that
rendered it is dlclosed the moment it returns. So the stack is a stack of
expressions on this side, and going into a field means sending a different
one — (.pos b) where the last one was b. It costs a re-evaluation per step,
which buys a view that is never stale and is why refresh is a key someone
presses rather than a timer.
Driven from fixtures, which is also the only way the cases a live program
will not hold still for get tested at all.
