3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
c2d378957e The x86 backend and dyn finally meet, which is where the dev loop is
x86 is what flan dev takes by default and dyn is the iteration feature, so
a backend that refused dyn meant the two halves of the dev loop could not
be in the same program. The refusal was one arm of is_agg, and it said the
true thing: it was never the representation that was missing. A dyn is
uint64_t, a scalar in both calling conventions, classified by every rule
this file already had; every operation on one is a Tast.Rt primitive and
call_rt has always known how to make one of those. What the lane actually
cost was the collector's root discipline.

Which is emit.ml's, reused rather than rewritten: Emit.dyn_roots counts the
roots for both backends now, so the pushes and the pops balance because one
counter decides both ends, and the two backends root the same nodes because
there is one counter and not two. A zeroed frame slot per dyn slot and per
dyn-producing call, minted beside the channel and outside every scoped --
the bump allocator reclaims at the end of a statement and a slot minted in
the body would be handed out again while the collector still held its
address. Pushed from the body buffer, not the prologue's, because a call
clobbers the registers the prologue is still spilling from. And one pop in
the epilogue, which is the whole of why this backend needed no landing-pad
work for it: there is exactly one epilogue, and the return, the fall-through
and the transfer exit all arrive at it. emit.ml needs the same pop at five
separate rets.

The ABI point the dyn handoff left open for the integrator is settled by
reading the other side rather than by agreeing: flan_dyn.c's mark follows a
value only when the quiet-NaN prefix is set, and the zero word does not have
it, so a zeroed root decodes as the double 0.0 and is never an address
anything dereferences. Zero is safe for a reason. The header says so now.

And one line in dev.ml that was never x86's: the merged dev host resets the
condition stacks and the frame chain between runs, because main is
re-entered by longjmp and pops no frame -- and it never reset the root
stack, so every root a finished run pushed still named stack the next run
was about to write over. That gap was an LLVM dev build's too.

Verification, and one of the numbers is new. @x86: MATCH 129 -> 135, DIFFER
0, REFUSED 0 -- the five dyn programs off survey.sh's llvmonly list, which
is gone rather than empty, plus p13. dune test --force green, with --x86
acceptance rows beside the LLVM ones for all five dyn programs, dyn-boundary
asserted on the same exit 134 and the same sentence on both.

p13-dyn-collect.flan is the one that is not a formality. Nothing else in
this repository allocates past flan_dyn.c's one-megabyte floor, so nothing
else collects even once, so a program whose roots are entirely wrong passes
every output test there is -- the handoff wrote that about the stub and it
outlived the stub. p13 allocates several megabytes of garbage while holding
live values across it: at forty times the corpus size it peaks at 4MB of
RSS, which is the collector running many times over, and both backends
still print the same four lines.
2026-09-19 14:22:55 +07:00
bd981ff87a Four dyn values in a defer the collector had never been told about
A defer is in the typed IR twice -- spliced into the body for the normal path,
and again in fdefers for the path a transfer leaves through -- so a dyn
temporary inside one is emitted twice. dyn_roots counted only the body's, and
the second copy went into slots nothing had rooted.

Nothing failed, and that is the whole reason this is worth a commit of its own.
dyn_tmp falls back to a plain slot rather than unbalancing the stack, so the
pushes and the pops still matched, the program ran and printed the right answer,
and the values were simply invisible. Against a stub that never collects there is
no symptom to find -- no leak, no crash, no wrong number. It would have become a
symptom the week the real collector landed, in a defer reached only on a handled
condition, which is close to the worst place to start looking.

What found it was the IR: a rooted slot is spelled %dr and the fallback %dx, and
the assertion is that no dyn program in the corpus emits one of the latter. That
is now a test over all five dyn programs, and it is the only check in the lane
that can see a missing root while there is still nothing to lose one by. When
the collector arrives it is the thing to extend rather than replace.

Also checked, both clean: flan dev --llvm builds and runs a dyn program, which
is the route the x86 refusal sends people to and would have been a link error in
the worst possible place; and the daemon's own refusal already names the flag.
2026-09-19 06:40:53 +07:00
4aa24c0e33 The zero-root question is the integrator's, and the handoff says which asks are open
Two decisions in this lane went against the brief and both are written down
where the next reader will meet them: the return slot stayed mandatory, so the
third state ret = None was to grow does not exist and neither does the fallout
listed for load.ml, shim.ml and cimport.ml; and the parameter rule is resolved in
Check rather than in parse.ml, because cimport passes C type names through
verbatim and POSIX's lowercase stat and timespec are writable in parameter
position, which is what makes a syntactic rule unsound rather than merely
awkward.

The open ABI point is in flan_dyn.h beside the root functions rather than only
in the handoff, because the header is what the two sides diff. A rooted slot
holding 0 is not a value: the compiler zeroes every root at entry because the
push happens before the code that fills it and possibly for a branch that never
runs, and 0 is the only pattern it can write without knowing the encoding. If
the real runtime NaN-boxes and integer zero is the zero word then this is wrong
and both sides change together.

Session.compatible needed nothing: it compares with Types.equal over the
parameters and the return, and dyn is equal to itself and to nothing else. Both
directions are pinned anyway, because this is the one place "changes signature"
covers a change the source does not spell out -- a parameter can become dyn, or
stop being dyn, by a type being declared elsewhere in the program.

@x86 128 match 0 differ 0 refused, @sanitize clean, dune test green.
2026-09-19 06:36:23 +07:00