The lo <= hi test in check_slice and slice-from-ptr's n >= 0 sat behind
--no-bounds-checks in both backends, while the comment beside each said
they could not be dropped. They are not bounds checks: hi <= len asks
whether a range fits inside a length, and lo <= hi asks whether the word
about to be written into a %slice's length field is a count at all. The
first stays behind the flag, the second is now emitted everywhere, the
way flan_vec_as_slice has always validated its own l > h in plain C.
emit.ml emits two signal blocks rather than one and i1, so an unchecked
build carries one compare. x86.ml keeps all three frame temporaries
stored outside the flag and gates only the second compare, because the
third is the length the message prints.
The IR assertion in test_acceptance now says the two slice calls are
present under --no-bounds-checks rather than absent, and the same build
is run: case 2 and case -2 of bounds.flan must still die.
`indexed` took an Array or a Slice, so a `(Ptr T)` that came back
from C was readable at element 0 through `deref` and nowhere else.
The length is not missing from the world — for `font.recs` it is in
the struct, one field over — it was missing from the language.
`(slice-from-ptr p n)` is the form that says it. No marker on the
name: `!` here means mutates and `?` means asks, and `zeroed`, the
nearest neighbour, carries neither; `ptr` is the marker, because a
`(Ptr T)` only ever arrives from a `declare-c`.
Nothing new in the representation. A slice is already {ptr, i64} in
both backends, so this is two insertvalues; `x86.ml` takes the new
constructor on its existing `unsupported` arm.
It refuses a first argument that is not a pointer, a negative literal
length at check time, and a negative computed one at run time — that
last through `signal_block` and `@flan_slice_error`, reused rather
than growing the runtime a function, and *signed*, because
`check_slice` compares unsigned and a negative i32 sign-extends to a
huge u64 that walks through it. Behind `f.md.checks` like the other
two: on at -O0 and -O2, off only when checks were asked off.
It owns nothing and needed no analysis to say so — a slice is not
move-only and carries no allocator, so `free` refuses it by the rule
that already refuses `(as-slice v)`.
`rl/font-recs` and `rl/font-glyphs` are where the promise is written,
beside raylib's own invariant rather than at every call site, and
they are the shape a count-naming binding directive could never have
covered. `examples/text-rectangle-bounds.flan` is the port that
motivated this and it runs; `test/programs/slice-from-ptr.flan`
covers the form with no raylib and no window.
print-str, print-i64, print-f64, print-bytes, print-line and newline leave
the prelude. print and println are the whole printing surface now, and print
is the better call at every one of the sites that used them: it is the same
structural walk without the newline, so the no-newline case the family was
kept for is covered, and it takes the value as it is. The old print-i64
forced an explicit (i64 x) at every call site, because this language widens
nothing implicitly; that cast is gone from 127 places.
Dropping it moves one answer. hash-grid returns u64, and the cast through
the signed printer showed sand-headless's hash as -2851001042534928384.
print routes a u64 through flan_u64_to_bytes, so it now prints
15595743031174623232 — the same 64 bits, read as the unsigned number they
are. The pinned expectation follows the correction.
test-flan-dev.el and test_session.ml both reached for print-line as "a name
the prelude has"; they reach for rand-seed instead.
