as-slice was a warning, not an operation. The input type already decides
which of the two things happens — a Vec can only be borrowed, an array or a
string can only be viewed, and no call site picks between them — so the second
name expressed no choice a reader could make. And it warned at the moment the
view is taken, which is the one moment nothing is wrong; the danger arrives
later, at the push. slice now takes a Vec at all three arities and as-slice
is gone.
(slice v lo) was free, and is the arity the Vec never had: the runtime already
reads a hi of -1 as "to the end", so the tail form passes the caller's lo and
the same -1 — no slot, no length read, no second evaluation. The merge is
entirely in the checker; the Vec path builds the flan_vec_as_slice call it
always built and neither backend has a line about any of it.
A Vec a call returned is refused at every arity, and not for the array's
reason. (slice (mk)) over an array dangles. (slice (make-vec)) does not — the
storage outlives the expression — but the header is a temporary, so nothing
can ever free the block. The refusal says that and names the let.
The name's own refusal sits in ordinary_call after every table, so a program
that defines an as-slice still reaches its own. It reads for somebody who has
never heard of the old name and writes the call back out, spelling each
argument that is a name or a number.
The warning moved to where it bites: BUILT.md gains a section beside the Vec
table and the push row points at it, spec-memory.md's Borrowing says the same.
Investigated and deliberately not built — a diagnostic for a live view at the
push. (reserve v 100) then a slice, a push and a read is correct code under
the contract the spec chose, so any flag on it is a false positive by the
language's own semantics rather than by an approximation. FIX.org has the
finding and the syntactic sketch that does not work.
The trio the author decided on 2026-09-20 is now all built: def is CL's
defparameter — its initialiser runs on every daemon re-run, unguarded, so
an edited initialiser repaints the same storage on C-c C-c plus re-run —
defonce (Clojure's name for CL's defvar, per the author) initialises once
behind the .init~once. flag, and defconst stays the image.
One parse arm reads both forms; the difference is Ast.reinit, carried to
Tast.global's grerun. Emit.startup_plan gives a def no guard flag, and
Check.check_global lifts every def initialiser — zero and literal
included — into global/<n>, so the host's startup reaches it through the
function cell and a re-evaluated def swaps it (Session's def_inits;
Emit.redefinition declares the cell for a non-sibling target). The old
defvar spelling is refused with the rename and both compiling spellings,
and every program, test, doc and editor list is swept — except sand.flan,
the author's live WIP, whose seven defvar lines are flagged in FIX.org
and keep its three dependent tests red on this branch.
Three notes, all of them about a comment that was true as far as it
went. The cost sentence on defer_slot said one i64 and one compare on
a path that is already unwinding, which is the unwind's share and not
the whole bill: every function with a defer also pays a store of zero
at entry and a store of an ordinal at each defer, on the ordinary path,
whether anything transfers or not. Small, correct, and now written
down as what it is.
init-conditions.flan is in test_valgrind.ml, and only the game-data
half earns that row -- it is the one that reaches a real (free src)
over a slot slurp transferred out of. The note half is output-only:
revert the fix and its trace changes, but a wrong integer in a global
is not a memory error and memcheck stays quiet. A later edit trimming
the edn dependency would leave the row green and blind, so the header
says so.
And register_defer saves in_defer rather than clearing it. Unreachable
today, because defer_ok is false inside a defer and nothing can nest
one; written so that the flag comes back rather than being dropped on
the day that changes.
The report was that handler-case segfaults in a top-level global
initialiser. It does not, and never did. What crashes is one frame
further down, in a position that has nothing to do with startup:
(defn read-file [path string] dyn
(let [src (slurp path (heap-allocator))]
(defer (free src))
(read (as-slice src))))
slurp signals FileError, a handler further out unwinds, and the
transfer leaves this frame through its defers -- all of them. But src
was never written: the form that would have written it is the form
that transferred. free then reads whatever the stack held under that
slot, which at -O0 in a small program is zero and at -O2 is a live
pointer, which is why the same program looked like an optimiser bug
from one direction and a startup bug from the other.
return never had this. The checker splices the defers registered above
it and no others, and says so where it does it. The transfer exit took
the whole list, because it is one landing block per function and
nothing in the IR said where each defer had come into being.
So the count is kept. The first defer in a function mints an i64 slot
zeroed at the top of the body; each defer leaves a store of its own
number where it was written; and fdefers -- the transfer path's copy,
and only that copy -- tests the count before running each one. The
normal paths are untouched and still need no test. It is all in the
checker: what reaches a backend is a slot, a store and an if, so
neither emitter learned anything and the x86 one needed no frame of
its own.
test/programs/init-conditions.flan is the survey. The top half is the
part of the report that was never true: handler-case with its
condition firing and with its body completing, handler-bind, and a
restart-case, all four in a global initialiser, all four answering
what they answer anywhere. The bottom half is the part that was: a
defer below the signalling form, which must not run, beside one above
it, which must -- a fix that took the unregistered one off by taking
them all off would have traded the crash for a leak, and 302/2 is the
line that would catch it. Three acceptance rows, LLVM, -O0 and --x86.
The detector was valgrind, not ASan: reading a stack slot nobody wrote
is not ASan's bug class and it reported nothing on the broken binary,
while memcheck named the conditional jump in flan_vec_free with the
unwinding frame directly above it. The program is in both lists --
test_valgrind.ml because that is what saw it, test_sanitize.ml because
that is where the transfer exit's frames are already watched.
spec-conditions.md section 5 now says which defers a transfer runs.
The author's (defvar game-data dyn (handler-case (edn/read-file ...)
[(FileError [c] nil)])) works.
