C-x C-e rendered the scalars and refused the rest, which made it a calculator
rather than a REPL. The renderer is now a compile-time walk over the type,
emitting a piece at a time: structs, nested structs, fixed arrays, slices,
options, enums by name, and pointers as their shape. A raylib Color comes back
through the FFI as (rl/Color {:r 17 :g 34 :b 51 :a 68}).
Piecewise emission is what makes composites possible at all - a struct is its
fields with punctuation between them, and concatenating that in generated IR
would need an allocator the language does not have.
u64 now renders, in C, with %llu. It used to refuse because i64->bytes is
signed and it would otherwise come back as -1, but refusing a whole struct
because one field is a u64 is much worse than adding a runtime entry point.
Strings are quoted and escaped in C for the same reason: unescaped content does
not round-trip and reads as a framing bug rather than as the value it is.
An enum renders as :name, recovered from the checker's table as a chain of
comparisons, since members are erased to i32 before the backend sees them; a
value outside the declared members falls through to its number, which is what
you would want to see. A pointer is rendered and never followed - it is the
only thing that could make the walk cycle, and dereferencing one a REPL was
handed is not a safe thing to do on someone's behalf.
Three bounds, easy to conflate. depth and span bound the walk, so sand's
[100 [100 u32]] grid does not unroll into ten thousand render sites. The output
is bounded once in the runtime, since a slice renders through a loop the
compiler cannot bound, and one place enforcing it means no renderer carries a
budget.
emit.ml's cast now treats an enum as the i32 it is. Nothing in the surface
language produces that - a keyword resolves against its enum and never widens -
but the renderer needs an enum's number when it falls outside the members.
Its stdout is a pipe into the daemon now, and whatever it printed since the
last reply rides along with the next one into *flan-output*. Arriving with a
reply rather than by a separate request is the point: the output an evaluation
itself caused is the output anyone wants to see.
Draining that pipe is a liveness requirement, not a nicety. A pipe nobody reads
fills at 64K and the next write blocks the program forever, so it is read from
the accept loop's select whether or not an editor is asking, and the buffer is
capped - a program printing every frame must not grow the daemon without limit,
and the newest text is the useful end.
test_dev read the program's transcript off the daemon's stdout, which is no
longer where it goes; it collects :output from replies instead, which is also
what the editor does. The emacs test moved to a fixture that keeps running,
since it now evaluates more times than the old one had reloads to give.
A different primitive from redefining a name. There is no name to install a
body into, so the expression is wrapped in a function with nowhere to be called
from; the module exports flan_reload_call to say "run this once", and the agent
calls it after the install - on the game thread, at a frame boundary, so an
expression that reads the program's state sees a point the program agrees is
consistent.
Nothing is marshalled back because nothing could be. A Flan value carries no
header, so no code at run time can say what it is; the compiler knows the type
and renders it there, in the thunk. That is the layout decision's bill, and it
is why the printer set is the scalars rather than everything.
The rendering does not go through stdout. Stdout belongs to the program, it is
in the hot path for anything that prints, and a dev-only feature must not put a
branch in it - so flan_rt.c is untouched and the value goes to flan_dev_result,
read back over the agent's socket. Safe without a handshake because the
generation counter is bumped last: the daemon waits for it to move rather than
assuming the program has reached a frame boundary.
u64 refuses by name, because i64->bytes is signed and anything past 2^63 would
come back negative. Everything without a derived printer refuses the same way.
A number that is quietly wrong is the failure this whole thing exists to
prevent.
An evaluation is not a declaration: the thunk is built against the program and
never spliced into it, so describe does not fill up with an eval/N for every
expression ever typed.
The test that matters is the same expression twice. The fixture increments
ticks every frame, so two evaluations must disagree - a value computed in the
compiler, or read from a copy of the program's state, would not.
