3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
9ce51ba94e One slice over everything with elements, and the warning at the push
as-slice was a warning, not an operation. The input type already decides
which of the two things happens — a Vec can only be borrowed, an array or a
string can only be viewed, and no call site picks between them — so the second
name expressed no choice a reader could make. And it warned at the moment the
view is taken, which is the one moment nothing is wrong; the danger arrives
later, at the push. slice now takes a Vec at all three arities and as-slice
is gone.

(slice v lo) was free, and is the arity the Vec never had: the runtime already
reads a hi of -1 as "to the end", so the tail form passes the caller's lo and
the same -1 — no slot, no length read, no second evaluation. The merge is
entirely in the checker; the Vec path builds the flan_vec_as_slice call it
always built and neither backend has a line about any of it.

A Vec a call returned is refused at every arity, and not for the array's
reason. (slice (mk)) over an array dangles. (slice (make-vec)) does not — the
storage outlives the expression — but the header is a temporary, so nothing
can ever free the block. The refusal says that and names the let.

The name's own refusal sits in ordinary_call after every table, so a program
that defines an as-slice still reaches its own. It reads for somebody who has
never heard of the old name and writes the call back out, spelling each
argument that is a name or a number.

The warning moved to where it bites: BUILT.md gains a section beside the Vec
table and the push row points at it, spec-memory.md's Borrowing says the same.
Investigated and deliberately not built — a diagnostic for a live view at the
push. (reserve v 100) then a slice, a push and a read is correct code under
the contract the spec chose, so any flag on it is a false positive by the
language's own semantics rather than by an approximation. FIX.org has the
finding and the syntactic sketch that does not work.
2026-09-21 09:51:35 +07:00
a4c6b996ff def re-runs its initialiser, and defvar is renamed defonce
The trio the author decided on 2026-09-20 is now all built: def is CL's
defparameter — its initialiser runs on every daemon re-run, unguarded, so
an edited initialiser repaints the same storage on C-c C-c plus re-run —
defonce (Clojure's name for CL's defvar, per the author) initialises once
behind the .init~once. flag, and defconst stays the image.

One parse arm reads both forms; the difference is Ast.reinit, carried to
Tast.global's grerun. Emit.startup_plan gives a def no guard flag, and
Check.check_global lifts every def initialiser — zero and literal
included — into global/<n>, so the host's startup reaches it through the
function cell and a re-evaluated def swaps it (Session's def_inits;
Emit.redefinition declares the cell for a non-sibling target). The old
defvar spelling is refused with the rename and both compiling spellings,
and every program, test, doc and editor list is swept — except sand.flan,
the author's live WIP, whose seven defvar lines are flagged in FIX.org
and keep its three dependent tests red on this branch.
2026-09-21 07:12:04 +07:00
495629f5f3 A global's initialiser may be computed, and both backends run it the same way
The x86 backend ran initialisers from .init_array and the LLVM one refused
them by name, so (defvar frame Allocator (arena-new 262144)) — which the
author kept writing — was a program on one backend and an error on the other.
A rule that holds on one backend and not the other is not a rule.

The checker lifts a computed initialiser into a function of its own and the
global's initialiser becomes the call. That is what gives it a frame, which is
the bug underneath the feature: a `let` or a `match` in an initialiser indexed
a slot array of length zero and took the x86 emitter down with an uncaught
Invalid_argument.

Both backends call the lifted initialisers from main, after flan_rt_init and
before a line of the program's own code — Odin's __$startup_runtime shape, not
a constructor, so the runtime is up and the order is the compiler's to choose.
x86 keeps .init_array for one thing only, and it is named: writing the
constant image this backend has no folder for, which is standing in for the
other backend's object image rather than for a program.

The computed globals are sorted by what they read, transitively through the
functions they call, so a global written above the one it reads works and a
ring is refused with every name in it. A reload still re-runs nothing: a new
global with a computed initialiser starts as ZII on both backends.

The refusal that lived in x86.ml is now the checker's and is narrower. Nothing
can escape an initialiser — the handler and restart stacks are empty and every
frame it pushes it also pops — so what is refused is a signal or an
invoke-restart with no handler-bind or restart-case around it, which is inert
by construction. A restart-case inside one is ordinary code, which is what
makes (defvar data (Vec u8) (slurp "level.edn")) an ordinary program.

Three refusals go with the premise they rested on: a container global with a
computed initialiser, a union member in a defvar, and a data type case in one.
A defconst is untouched and keeps all three.

One change here is not about any of that. sand.flan carried an unfinished
line — (defvar game-data (embed (with-allocator frame ))), which parses as a
declaration whose type is (embed ...) — so the checker refused the file and
`dune test` was red at the tip of dev-loop before a line of this landed,
verified by stashing this work and rebuilding. It is commented out rather than
guessed at: the arena above it is the half that works, and what the global
should read is the author's to decide.
2026-09-19 04:24:52 +07:00