render.ml's output and emacs/flan-inspect.el's parser are the two ends of one
wire format, which is why the printer was left on the colon when the rest of
the corpus moved: shifting it alone would have broken inspection in the dev
loop without breaking a test that said so. They move together here.
The field list in the inspector is labelled with the dot too, which is the
spelling flan-inspect-step-expr already used to build `(.x b)' — the label and
the expression it stands for now read the same.
One case needed a guard the colon never did: `...' also begins with a dot and
is the renderer saying it stopped, not a field called `..'. A field name never
starts with a second dot, so one character of lookahead separates them.
The colon is not gone from the rendered grammar. An enum member is `:green' and
is a *value*, so the two are now told apart by the character alone, which is
the only thing that distinguishes them.
Also font lock, handed over with the same change: `:name' was the rule that
drew field labels, and with the colon belonging to keywords every label in the
corpus was left unfontified. `.name' is drawn as a constant, in both the places
it appears — the label in `{.x 1.0}' and the accessor in `(.x v)', which are
the same name.
The mutation pass turned up one defect that did not make the suite go
red: a reader branch that forgets to advance reads the same character
for ever, and dune test waits as long as it is left to. In CI that is a
job killed by the runner with nothing named and no output to read.
watchdog.ml puts an alarm on every test binary — generous, because an
alarm that fires on a slow machine is a flake — and a five-second one
around each read in test_flan, where the budget really is small. The
first read that does not return wedges the rest, so a looping reader
costs five seconds and names the row instead of costing eight minutes
or never finishing. Both were watched: the string-escape loop now fails
in five seconds with the case named, and the per-binary backstop was
armed short and observed to fire.
print-str, print-i64, print-f64, print-bytes, print-line and newline leave
the prelude. print and println are the whole printing surface now, and print
is the better call at every one of the sites that used them: it is the same
structural walk without the newline, so the no-newline case the family was
kept for is covered, and it takes the value as it is. The old print-i64
forced an explicit (i64 x) at every call site, because this language widens
nothing implicitly; that cast is gone from 127 places.
Dropping it moves one answer. hash-grid returns u64, and the cast through
the signed printer showed sand-headless's hash as -2851001042534928384.
print routes a u64 through flan_u64_to_bytes, so it now prints
15595743031174623232 — the same 64 bits, read as the unsigned number they
are. The pinned expectation follows the correction.
test-flan-dev.el and test_session.ml both reached for print-line as "a name
the prelude has"; they reach for rand-seed instead.
flan-repl.el is a comint buffer whose every line goes through the same
eval-expr request C-x C-e uses - no new protocol, no compiler support. Deriving
from comint rather than hand-rolling a prompt is the same call as deriving
flan-mode from lisp-mode: history, the input ring and kill/yank already exist
and are not worth rewriting. There is no subprocess behind it; the "process" is
a stub comint needs in order to have a prompt.
It is program-scoped: a name typed at the prompt resolves against the running
program's top-level namespace, so in sand you write sim/settle. A buffer
visiting a package's file gets the alias applied for it because the file says
which package it belongs to, and a prompt has no file to derive one from. RET
on a half-typed form opens a line instead of sending it, with balance checked
through the Flan syntax table so a paren inside a string does not count.
A value and the program's output are different things and arrive by different
routes: the value is the result of the request and appears at the prompt, while
anything printed rides along on the same reply into *flan-output*. Showing them
in one place would be convenient and wrong, so there is a test for the
separation - and it caught a real bug. The renderer's Unit case emitted () with
no evaluation at all, so (print-line "x"), the most ordinary thing anyone types
at a prompt, answered while nothing happened. A Unit expression is almost
always a call made for its effect; it is evaluated and then reported.
C-x C-e rendered the scalars and refused the rest, which made it a calculator
rather than a REPL. The renderer is now a compile-time walk over the type,
emitting a piece at a time: structs, nested structs, fixed arrays, slices,
options, enums by name, and pointers as their shape. A raylib Color comes back
through the FFI as (rl/Color {:r 17 :g 34 :b 51 :a 68}).
Piecewise emission is what makes composites possible at all - a struct is its
fields with punctuation between them, and concatenating that in generated IR
would need an allocator the language does not have.
u64 now renders, in C, with %llu. It used to refuse because i64->bytes is
signed and it would otherwise come back as -1, but refusing a whole struct
because one field is a u64 is much worse than adding a runtime entry point.
Strings are quoted and escaped in C for the same reason: unescaped content does
not round-trip and reads as a framing bug rather than as the value it is.
An enum renders as :name, recovered from the checker's table as a chain of
comparisons, since members are erased to i32 before the backend sees them; a
value outside the declared members falls through to its number, which is what
you would want to see. A pointer is rendered and never followed - it is the
only thing that could make the walk cycle, and dereferencing one a REPL was
handed is not a safe thing to do on someone's behalf.
Three bounds, easy to conflate. depth and span bound the walk, so sand's
[100 [100 u32]] grid does not unroll into ten thousand render sites. The output
is bounded once in the runtime, since a slice renders through a loop the
compiler cannot bound, and one place enforcing it means no renderer carries a
budget.
emit.ml's cast now treats an enum as the i32 it is. Nothing in the surface
language produces that - a keyword resolves against its enum and never widens -
but the renderer needs an enum's number when it falls outside the members.
A different primitive from redefining a name. There is no name to install a
body into, so the expression is wrapped in a function with nowhere to be called
from; the module exports flan_reload_call to say "run this once", and the agent
calls it after the install - on the game thread, at a frame boundary, so an
expression that reads the program's state sees a point the program agrees is
consistent.
Nothing is marshalled back because nothing could be. A Flan value carries no
header, so no code at run time can say what it is; the compiler knows the type
and renders it there, in the thunk. That is the layout decision's bill, and it
is why the printer set is the scalars rather than everything.
The rendering does not go through stdout. Stdout belongs to the program, it is
in the hot path for anything that prints, and a dev-only feature must not put a
branch in it - so flan_rt.c is untouched and the value goes to flan_dev_result,
read back over the agent's socket. Safe without a handshake because the
generation counter is bumped last: the daemon waits for it to move rather than
assuming the program has reached a frame boundary.
u64 refuses by name, because i64->bytes is signed and anything past 2^63 would
come back negative. Everything without a derived printer refuses the same way.
A number that is quietly wrong is the failure this whole thing exists to
prevent.
An evaluation is not a declaration: the thunk is built against the program and
never spliced into it, so describe does not fill up with an eval/N for every
expression ever typed.
The test that matters is the same expression twice. The fixture increments
ticks every frame, so two evaluations must disagree - a value computed in the
compiler, or read from a copy of the program's state, would not.
